From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751247AbWGLKt5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jul 2006 06:49:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751249AbWGLKt5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jul 2006 06:49:57 -0400 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.178]:65509 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751247AbWGLKt5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jul 2006 06:49:57 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jSZeLe7WNFRZFnd1/uTdd5iB2gt9PvTysTTAN+76lJzQTMEuvnOrY5HNpb8wquxi4S/tSb70ruKbHY9ciRGNsJC2mHi1i/KEUD8gwzT2yGwCtO46hbxSEoAW0ZhzoYpQeDEu+vEfEOhOv0/VwvqkBgAZrKVFLM5nlX4lVe9fdtw= Message-ID: <6bffcb0e0607120349s7fd194e1xf92f194ebcd17d9f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 12:49:56 +0200 From: "Michal Piotrowski" To: "Catalin Marinas" Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Kernel memory leak detector 0.8 Cc: "Joseph Fannin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060710220901.5191.66488.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <6bffcb0e0607110527x4520d5bbne8b9b3639a821a18@mail.gmail.com> <6bffcb0e0607110546r11d2f619pbcd1205999253bd@mail.gmail.com> <6bffcb0e0607110551v272deebcua5dc3f782ed25a7f@mail.gmail.com> <20060712095730.GA19478@nineveh.rivenstone.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/07/06, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On 12/07/06, Joseph Fannin wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 02:00:05PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > That's a bug in gcc-4. The __builtin_constant_p() function always > > > returns true even when the argument is not a constant. You could try a > > > gcc-3.4 or a patched gcc. > > > > Which gcc versions are affected by this? > > From gcc-4.0 I think but I don't know when/if it was fixed in the > latest. gcc-4.2 --version gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.0 20060701 (experimental) works fine for me. Regards, Michal -- Michal K. K. Piotrowski LTG - Linux Testers Group (http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/ltg/wiki/)