From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161172AbXD2VQ4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:16:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161339AbXD2VQ4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:16:56 -0400 Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.229]:64602 "EHLO nz-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161172AbXD2VQy convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:16:54 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZeIurBqEiA3WF20E4PM4PZ/P+Eax2WVPTAATum7/tXk6weKPMTmASdaegOEgfWI+fSSoZx/OtTOcXKbhCvQ0D6pGzleBTShcr8B/oRimGMX1FR4qJE3f8Gg0vu9XEAIeZJJy6AzuIBJMEDSVuKTl9Kkq0/MbDTiH5f09rehX/oM= Message-ID: <6bffcb0e0704291416u402668ffo9bcaafb389228981@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:16:51 +0200 From: "Michal Piotrowski" To: "Adrian Bunk" Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.21 Cc: "Diego Calleja" , "Andi Kleen" , "Linus Torvalds" , "Chuck Ebbert" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" In-Reply-To: <20070429211028.GT3468@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070428224904.GE3468@stusta.de> <20070429173500.GA30248@one.firstfloor.org> <20070429180909.GA30604@one.firstfloor.org> <20070429214007.9ea12e96.diegocg@gmail.com> <20070429201729.GQ3468@stusta.de> <20070429225657.a501ab5a.diegocg@gmail.com> <20070429211028.GT3468@stusta.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 29/04/07, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 10:56:57PM +0200, Diego Calleja wrote: > > El Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:17:29 +0200, Adrian Bunk escribió: > > > > > Bugzilla might not be perfect, but it works and it's better than doing > > > it by hand. > > > > The good thing about the wiki is that it doesn't exclude bugzilla. It's > > just a "regressions list", it doesn't intends to replace bugzilla. If a bug > > doesn't gets fixed for a while, I don't think it's very useful to keep it > > forever in the list like you do in the bugzilla, because I don't think > > it's possible to fix every single bug, and it steals you time to fix bugs > > that you are able to fix. > > > > It's not great but it's the best clone of you we've found 8) > > What exactly is the purpose of the 2.6.21 regressions list in the Wiki? It's for -stable team. I didn't saw any 2.6.22-stuff regression yet. > > cu > Adrian Regards, Michal -- Michal K. K. Piotrowski Kernel Monkeys (http://kernel.wikidot.com/start)