From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934410AbXGUAQp (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jul 2007 20:16:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757629AbXGUAQh (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jul 2007 20:16:37 -0400 Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.225]:43826 "EHLO nz-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757449AbXGUAQf (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jul 2007 20:16:35 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BKn/+U4d/jnv5/VfOAj6CefNGOsWMwlc6U4uc28gU/dy8S2+TsVet18TVDFQbNa6bwxkKhdwRUaWUJZh0MdK1pgNcStPF0pyLROnjmHFmbx89aTvz+TXVvhVIr/udrkqTgIYzKyMYDlEjPkKcyHesKwlgDxBuevcZz5BI2M5x5I= Message-ID: <6bffcb0e0707201716p7ed33e26p9156bebc4207b550@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 02:16:34 +0200 From: "Michal Piotrowski" To: "Ingo Molnar" Subject: Re: [RFC, Announce] Unified x86 architecture, arch/x86 Cc: "Thomas Gleixner" , LKML , "Linus Torvalds" , "Andrew Morton" , "Andi Kleen" , "Arjan van de Ven" , "Chris Wright" , "Steven Rostedt" In-Reply-To: <20070721000309.GA24829@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1184970779.4012.38.camel@chaos> <6bffcb0e0707201655q664202e6v29b4e678de1b0d80@mail.gmail.com> <20070721000309.GA24829@elte.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 21/07/07, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > > >We are pleased to announce a project we've been working on for some > > >time: the unified x86 architecture tree, or "arch/x86" - and we'd > > >like to solicit feedback about it. > > > > > >What is this about? > > [..] > > >As usual, comments and suggestions are welcome! > > > > I really like this idea - code duplication is a bad thing. > > > > BTW. I don't see any regression here :) > > cool - could you tell us a bit more about on what type of box you tried > it, it is an old P4 (i386) > and how wide and versatile the .config is? http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/tbf/bitis-gabonica/2.6.22-git15/config > > Ingo > Regards, Michal -- LOG http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/