From: "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <lkml@metux.net>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <info@metux.net>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: srvfs: file system for posting open file descriptors into fs namespace
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 13:27:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6c2ab429-eab6-1dbe-08d4-9646f736a4c1@metux.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200807162305.GT1236603@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On 07.08.20 18:23, Al Viro wrote:
Hi,
>> This is a concept from Plan9. The main purpose is allowing applications
>> "dialing" some connection, do initial handshakes (eg. authentication)
>> and then publish the connection to other applications, that now can now
>> make use of the already dialed connection.
>
> Yeah, but... Linux open() always gets a new struct file instance;
I know :(
> how
> do you work around that? Some variant of ->atomic_open() API change?
> Details, please.
Proxy struct file. Yes, this adds lots of bloat :(
https://github.com/metux/linux-srvfs-oot/blob/master/kernel/proxy.c
I thought about some possible ugly tricks of copying over one into
another, but that could easily end up in a desaster.
Another idea would be adding a new fs-op that returns it's own struct
file - basically kinda per-fs open() syscall - which is called instead
of .open, if defined.
But for now, I tried to implement it as oot-module (and submit for
mainline later), so it could also be used on existing distro kernels.
Maybe that's not the best idea at all :o
What'd be your suggestion ?
--mtx
--
---
Hinweis: unverschlüsselte E-Mails können leicht abgehört und manipuliert
werden ! Für eine vertrauliche Kommunikation senden Sie bitte ihren
GPG/PGP-Schlüssel zu.
---
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Free software and Linux embedded engineering
info@metux.net -- +49-151-27565287
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-10 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-07 11:09 Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2020-08-07 16:23 ` Al Viro
2020-08-10 11:27 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6c2ab429-eab6-1dbe-08d4-9646f736a4c1@metux.net \
--to=lkml@metux.net \
--cc=info@metux.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®