From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: xilinx: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 09:37:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6c37d6f5-95d3-71a3-760f-68be535cceab@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqKy7qWDkU3z1p0oTn1umLzWchKw86Zu8mKzugDWQXJF-w@mail.gmail.com>
On 3/14/23 14:23, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 5:19 AM Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/10/23 15:47, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
>>> of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
>>> of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As
>>> part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the
>>> recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test
>>> for presence of a property and nothing more.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c b/drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c
>>> index 78a8a7545d1e..641dcc958911 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/xilinx/zynqmp_power.c
>>> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static int zynqmp_pm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> } else if (ret != -EACCES && ret != -ENODEV) {
>>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to Register with Xilinx Event manager %d\n", ret);
>>> return ret;
>>> - } else if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "mboxes", NULL)) {
>>> + } else if (of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "mboxes")) {
>>> zynqmp_pm_init_suspend_work =
>>> devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
>>> sizeof(struct zynqmp_pm_work_struct),
>>> @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static int zynqmp_pm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request rx channel\n");
>>> return PTR_ERR(rx_chan);
>>> }
>>> - } else if (of_find_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "interrupts", NULL)) {
>>> + } else if (of_property_present(pdev->dev.of_node, "interrupts")) {
>>> irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>>> if (irq <= 0)
>>> return -ENXIO;
>>> --
>>> 2.39.2
>>>
>>
>> Waiting for v2 because of missing of.h header reported by lkp.
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/202303120017.BIw01Y21-lkp@intel.com/
>
> It's a false positive. The header change is in v6.3-rc1, but 0-day is
> applying these to branches not yet updated to rc1.
ok. applied.
Thanks,
Michal
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-28 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-10 14:47 Rob Herring
2023-03-11 16:15 ` kernel test robot
2023-03-13 10:18 ` Michal Simek
2023-03-14 13:23 ` Rob Herring
2023-03-28 7:37 ` Michal Simek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6c37d6f5-95d3-71a3-760f-68be535cceab@amd.com \
--to=michal.simek@amd.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®