From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
To: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] mmc: dw_mmc: check card present before starting request
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 10:26:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6c5f8e6c-efbc-667e-2a7b-00381e8a5646@rock-chips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57479A84.4080207@samsung.com>
Hi Jaehoon,
On 2016/5/27 8:53, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> Hi Shawn,
>
> On 05/26/2016 12:08 PM, Shawn Lin wrote:
>> The main reason to add this check is to avoid unnecessary
>> mmc_request if the card is removed. Although we have already
>> check this in dw_mci_handle_cd for runtime usage of sd card and
>> dw_mci_init_slot for noremovable devices, but there is a timing
>> gap before it really calls dw_mci_get_cd as mmc_detect_change needs
>> some delay here.
>
> What's unnecessary mmc_request?
the on-going read/write/ and the corresponding sbc like cmd13, etc.
>
>>
>> Another gain here is that we could save some checkings of card status
>> after sd card been removed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
>> ---
>>
>> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> index cb30e91..2940d24 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> @@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ struct idmac_desc {
>> static bool dw_mci_reset(struct dw_mci *host);
>> static bool dw_mci_ctrl_reset(struct dw_mci *host, u32 reset);
>> static int dw_mci_card_busy(struct mmc_host *mmc);
>> +static int dw_mci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc);
>>
>> #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
>> static int dw_mci_req_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
>> @@ -1248,6 +1249,8 @@ static void dw_mci_request(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq)
>>
>> WARN_ON(slot->mrq);
>>
>> + dw_mci_get_cd(mmc);
>> +
>
> If my understanding is right, it can be replaced
>
> if (!test_bit(DW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT, &slot->flags))
>
> to
>
> if (!dw_mci_get_cd(mmc))
yeah~ It looks better.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Jaehoon Chung
>
>
>
>> /*
>> * The check for card presence and queueing of the request must be
>> * atomic, otherwise the card could be removed in between and the
>>
>
>
>
>
--
Best Regards
Shawn Lin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-27 2:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20160526030949epcas1p4960ec32140a9ac70ff7616031d667cfe@epcas1p4.samsung.com>
2016-05-26 3:08 ` Shawn Lin
2016-05-27 0:53 ` Jaehoon Chung
2016-05-27 2:26 ` Shawn Lin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6c5f8e6c-efbc-667e-2a7b-00381e8a5646@rock-chips.com \
--to=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®