From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755068AbcIEHJ6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Sep 2016 03:09:58 -0400 Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.11]:41409 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752520AbcIEHJy (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Sep 2016 03:09:54 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/5] Documentation: Add support for TI System Control Interface (TI-SCI) protocol To: Dave Gerlach , Nishanth Menon , Rob Herring References: <20160830130647.6828-1-nm@ti.com> <20160830130647.6828-2-nm@ti.com> <20160902150628.GA19493@rob-hp-laptop> <57C9E0A8.4010701@ti.com> CC: Lokesh Vutla , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Sudeep Holla , lkml , "Andrew F . Davis" , Russell King , Russ Dill , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Santosh Shilimkar , dt list From: Tero Kristo Message-ID: <6c63b044-3db9-9202-b790-350a88b9eab0@ti.com> Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 10:09:10 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <57C9E0A8.4010701@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/09/16 23:27, Dave Gerlach wrote: > On 09/02/2016 12:07 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: >> Rob, >> >> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Rob Herring wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 08:06:43AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote: >> [...] >>>> + >>>> +TI-SCI Client Device Node: >>>> +======================== >>>> + >>>> +Client nodes refer to the required TI-SCI device using the "ti,sci" >>>> property. >>> >>> As I mentioned for power domains, for clients that are self contained >>> (i.e. a single function) I think the should be child nodes. >>> >> >> Thanks for the feedback. I think we should be able to do that and also >> assume you have no further improvements you'd like to see here. >> >> Looking at current Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scpi.txt >> -> it makes sense to stick along the same lines as you mentioned. >> >> Dave, Tero: do you guys have any objections? > > No objections, I think this is a logical move. Yea, sounds like a valid change. I believe you are going to post a new version so I can modify the clock driver also accordingly? -Tero