From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [168.119.38.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3C1E5293E2; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 09:03:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790067821; cv=none; b=bIXa6W56jDqox8Oyi/j+kKBZIgax0yY/nFf/kkbuNLearOaagL6WbVtVImHR8wIN2FfvYcwfZ899MNoju5hGPcbIl/MjionbBt152SqbClWVEJ+P2YsAWWGSh7yL2VAjc3stXc+p7/Rs+BAPD6kwdE1SDpeaCeqI6+80izcw8X0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790067821; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aYT+mVzhxslav4KMaqbakCWbpNHc8NrsSWL/s9tf+JM=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=uNWSxzvArYBFjKS6+XJfeJkjaejBZYlQypcDgODb8R48DlnAN5mOj5dJNq891cwD8sKyfhgP3jfHf5hQHtXQsvsA9kN769c5ytoFBBuYI1XJnWpxe3WXwE3WpjkJwPqgau0YeU98IXfDEQ1OIhy1ODK4V+Nfa0G9hDx9DY9ZAd0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=permerror header.from=sipsolutions.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b=T9lObZWE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=permerror header.from=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b="T9lObZWE" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=8uLeZHTq/tLb8yUdK4wo9lY1ExTBRxuRwq6XRjmQByg=; t=1790067819; x=1791277419; b=T9lObZWE4oX7ETYow+JmjrzX3X+PqmP5xwrbSuajrlWfqNz 5U4IIOYt+zuy7m9lqg7EfL2TKv0tclzFC9nEoOgiEj7madjnuWqhiOGLWOy3ekpsXu+qVbn194eQg fI/gX7WRqHP+7cmm9/KvH+s8VI3wmHPQ/U9JJF1w6pZ/SnA6+LCLy+gxBT+9iagsxkcIS96wjhmgo rNzPJUNVAUfgLwduFnK7jKtecDGOqN+JfNklhYNS0Vi4Gw8F3qktymKwfvYBBR+MfmBLiWTSSN+6d w1g6GhQ4j6fkXvF7mP9hrfw00H0FtgpLWmehBJcDE1YKYGNuYo41b3MLttmHjpLw==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__ECDSA_SECP256R1_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1x8wPO-00000006mxx-46Ou; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 11:03:27 +0200 Message-ID: <6c7170af0a7cbe62573fae461b94556f850318ee.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] net: dropreason: use new __print_sym() in tracing From: Johannes Berg To: Ilya Maximets , Matthieu Baerts Cc: Steven Rostedt , Masami Hiramatsu , Mathieu Desnoyers , Aaron Conole , Eelco Chaudron , dev@openvswitch.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Adrian Moreno , Antoine Tenart Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 11:03:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: (sfid-20260922_110114_464147_BE59E097) References: <20260921101538.97286-6-johannes@sipsolutions.net> <20260921101538.97286-9-johannes@sipsolutions.net> <98b93c98-21ae-4248-a60a-9625a20508ad@kernel.org> <7f557f5a-b21e-45cc-9d3a-cd4f8b5f799b@ovn.org> <99e5f7c0d7debc8a59bac96e93f09600bf488ca8.camel@sipsolutions.net> <4a0240a7b9ff87302620a95c73f4f265cd428618.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20260922_110114_464147_BE59E097) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.60.2 (3.60.2-2.fc44) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned On Tue, 2026-09-22 at 11:01 +0200, Ilya Maximets wrote: >=20 > Matthieu mentioned we'll need CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS in the selftest config > shard: tools/testing/selftests/net/openvswitch/config Right, I was going to comment on that but then while I was writing and testing all your emails came in and I forgot. > Is that a new dependency or was it always there we just missed adding it > to the config before? (it's included in the common net config, so that > is probably the reason why CI doesn't fail) It can't really be new, perf to capture this was always used, I'm just changing how the output is formatted. Perhaps better to have that as a separate fix/cleanup? johannes