Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests: Add a test mangling with uc_sigmask

[Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>]

On 6/7/24 19:12, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 06:53:27PM +0530, Dev Jain wrote:
>> On 6/7/24 18:42, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 05:53:19PM +0530, Dev Jain wrote:
>>>> + * Test describing a clear distinction between signal states - delivered and
>>>> + * blocked, and their relation with ucontext.
>>> This would be clearer if it said more positiviely what the relationship
>>> between these things is actually expected to be and how they're tested.
>>> Right now it's a bit hard to tell what the test is actually verifying.
>> I thought I had described that quite well in the code comments.
>> Anyways, I shall incorporate some detail into the initial test
>> description too.
> If the overview is confusing and people have to read the code to figure
> out what it means then that's an issue...


You are right.

I shall post a v2 rather quickly, perhaps in 1-2 days;

the SIGPIPE vs SIGSEGV mistake basically renders

this patch useless (although the test would still

pass), and makes the code unnecessarily hard

to review.