Re: [PATCH 09/15] tty: fix kernel-doc for functions in tty.h

[Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>]

On 19. 09. 23, 12:45, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 19. 09. 23, 12:07, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 Sep 2023, Jiri Slaby (SUSE) wrote:
>>
>>> tty_kref_get() is already included in Documentation, but is not properly
>>> formatted. Fix this.
>>>
>>> tty_get_baud_rate() is neither properly formatted, nor is included. Fix
>>> both.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@kernel.org>
>>> ---
>>>   Documentation/driver-api/tty/tty_ioctl.rst |  3 +++
>>>   include/linux/tty.h                        | 21 +++++++++------------
>>>   2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/tty/tty_ioctl.rst 
>>> b/Documentation/driver-api/tty/tty_ioctl.rst
>>> index 9b0be79fc15e..3ff1ac5e07f1 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/driver-api/tty/tty_ioctl.rst
>>> +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/tty/tty_ioctl.rst
>>> @@ -5,3 +5,6 @@ TTY IOCTL Helpers
>>>   =================
>>>   .. kernel-doc:: drivers/tty/tty_ioctl.c
>>> +
>>> +.. kernel-doc:: include/linux/tty.h
>>> +   :identifiers: tty_get_baud_rate
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/tty.h b/include/linux/tty.h
>>> index 59d675f345e9..4b6340ac2af2 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/tty.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/tty.h
>>> @@ -390,14 +390,12 @@ int vcs_init(void);
>>>   extern const struct class tty_class;
>>>   /**
>>> - *    tty_kref_get        -    get a tty reference
>>> - *    @tty: tty device
>>> + * tty_kref_get - get a tty reference
>>> + * @tty: tty device
>>>    *
>>> - *    Return a new reference to a tty object. The caller must hold
>>> - *    sufficient locks/counts to ensure that their existing 
>>> reference cannot
>>> - *    go away
>>> + * Returns: a new reference to a tty object. The caller must hold 
>>> sufficient
>>> + * locks/counts to ensure that their existing reference cannot go away
>>
>> Shouldn't this have also Locking: entry instead of hiding the details 
>> into
>> Return?
> 
> /me left to fix both in a separate patch.

Ah, no. The Locking Alan introduced means what _this_ function locks. I 
am not sure we want to extend the meaning to _expected_ locks?

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs