From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 013.lax.mailroute.net (013.lax.mailroute.net [199.89.1.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 737B5430CC5; Fri, 10 Jul 2026 14:47:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783694836; cv=none; b=Bpf5GUmqXmw+RMwxhMWnFODlSxj6SvbBaJLuie8UiSXTNHo/sQFSlTsaR+XpyQFERbjYE6bRizJlKIGV7mDYdD8gEHJdPAjA3KhMZnW6k1gUsmD1n4Kq2B8Kk4apBgenkEs9WtUSgnuh/7zmAkRh8u5lATCG2GRxi5msiwjwdAo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783694836; c=relaxed/simple; bh=POqwcdHcpscz1y3DezXHaVnEUYftR7WIU2tXLiLnDeY=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=fdrxBaQzvoUoRHWvOm6qj1STW1kpF/Zz6uyAU+/ZsH9ap5z8UDwA941czIRkJv8Faa2WUXECBP1ip4lAmoxE+zHta6p5940J+Icr2F/Lg3dlPZOQFws7HfQUEdhcxxNXQadN+opo7iLeYp9JKmys22xzgcIaUP+mncl/LQgCbQI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b=J2Pala4i; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b="J2Pala4i" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 013.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4gxZRd146Mzlh304; Fri, 10 Jul 2026 14:47:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acm.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :from:from:content-language:references:subject:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mr01; t=1783694823; x=1786286824; bh=bdAKnK8os679pGOewYuuhBSP yqHJgd6ADT1TQgqo0o8=; b=J2Pala4ijASB/8Q9sh3FiBns86l5UrxT4SjzeKEA puCJ9Glv5OrGMhQQVm3HWJZC4HgyEaNPa9X71QfHpSLDBFRRR5o/vu4c8sZ6BYYC 4a/XhVu5AO4GP1fZcHdVALI7yPA0eTmRk8+/aFMAAhEzA6Vr3E/Fd5ZhNx7rGbM6 GWLb8F+tkuJ78ApME0I6/f6BzI9XsrSJv8+BI7Fg/UDfomN1AneACa34CjdKbs5B LQjAkuH8GU2WhBiki0/Y3FQZSNWApc0wtkwk8+8JpRMvBUUmR4/XxEZjobN8Hizz WdC4Ic2yllcCVC5kpd3RrAkn4a+zkAGM8k5E/uyI2V0mww== X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from 013.lax.mailroute.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (013.lax [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10029) with LMTP id v2fkS2rGdq4e; Fri, 10 Jul 2026 14:47:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.50.14] (c-73-231-117-72.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.117.72]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bvanassche@acm.org) by 013.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4gxZRP16drzlh2fy; Fri, 10 Jul 2026 14:46:56 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <6d087f28-5795-4929-b5d3-3f78d9b9bc60@acm.org> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 07:46:55 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Add support for the aggregated read query opcode To: hyenc.jeong@samsung.com, "James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com" , "martin.petersen@oracle.com" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" Cc: ALIM AKHTAR , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Jinyoung Choi , Dukhyun Kwon , Jeuk Kim , Keoseong Park , Jaemyung Lee , Jieon Seol , Gyusun Lee , Yunjae Jo References: <20260710054556epcms2p68986e2af26f42e63c87ab8fde034e450@epcms2p6> Content-Language: en-US From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: <20260710054556epcms2p68986e2af26f42e63c87ab8fde034e450@epcms2p6> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 7/9/26 10:45 PM, Hyeoncheol Jeong wrote: > struct utp_transfer_cmd_desc { > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0u8 command_upiu[ALIGNED_UPIU_SIZE]; > - =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0u8 response_upiu[ALIGNED_UPIU_SIZE]; > + =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0u8 response_upiu[ALIGNED_RSP_UPIU_SIZE]; > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0u8 prd_table[]; > }; This change increases the size of every CQ entry and also of every LRB entry by about 4 KiB. This is not acceptable. Bart.