From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755973AbdJJJ2p (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Oct 2017 05:28:45 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:57090 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755662AbdJJJ2n (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Oct 2017 05:28:43 -0400 Subject: Re: ARM: SAMSUNG: Improve a size determination in 13 functions To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Kukjin Kim , Russell King , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org References: <75c352ad-c51e-2e63-2f93-0f14522ff09c@users.sourceforge.net> <7f196313-ad49-2cd8-e45f-be487e089547@users.sourceforge.net> <20171004191102.mnswu25bjxynuh4o@kozik-lap> From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: <6d573f66-8735-f745-e0bd-27cc29880eb0@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 11:28:08 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171004191102.mnswu25bjxynuh4o@kozik-lap> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:02VuEuXgbYGhWGq5HQr++mvHDWGctGgsLgvSyj41OLukfsAqC9w EV51tUt4eoB38CQuG8w7noySkw1hkKtpubYe8cANHbz7hYGkoC93G/Z2g9KU7byUNO7Mohb NWfMPxCjFkdcmipgu5hAl8ZAdkw83rXZbnyLrarO95k7JUTkbhnmPUQsyYNOL04haw9p6uF +pEFOJtVpPOoujibOzcYw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:sBf64q7GfCo=:hAoITASMdm17C6OAFY2qOk Xv0lVGDsf2ra+p07AwjRhW8ewVXHIGMK9U0tPUm5w2B6511cb99A/y/MP78QNfl9O6rtNcqeK j3934BlCN2YmmqmUykocXZcdf6VqNWOvUjMS85vnhUqeNx0Uj5fUil6cC58olHLAfLyI6W9jg LkUZFHBW0vY53Jx5RQK97jeuJEPq4Irn0bQaJ5hy5o2GFSLyPADlk11twUs4xf303vxsEINuq Puqew52ybOpgW0hVSMtR83pjb4+8xj/xEfAwTHFbZPfIz1+0qLH+5Z3M57QWnmTR4SQyl2RaR QH7zFOnblOxafOR/CAiNY2K4i/BoLZXoJPVSDBkRFyqHiocKyBVrDsbpGsDcVmYOYnvJ+kwEm YaQBHE8osqX+2xYYxQyhz+QFbfNAJBDnjIsQYSz+K806tmAxFAbc7kobOmqfnyE33SytCQbV2 J+MV2FUZ3DZuvuj7uDMCfihUTHKRTOvJ4bwL2XzhVijPNn5pmMqTsDkyT439mbPp5VvH6X5M5 Eq9KQHmJkL1fGBeEaj4yh4j14RzAh9N/DMZCZGqklDPIGP8oX/y/X3fqBZsX1xbwW4q8rkJ+P xquHwKbV9dooNUQMAMnN0U3zqQu9q9Y9eq4G7FSz+IBjbv0bGS8eoWJc5jmRKvh4yDHTxSZ/l IbWyTRgTqw0rXgJ+Hjgf2PFPsiD26c5IqgOzFptXSSKNDueFv1K1CIKSGTIhfV9c72xhcKzAz 6ZrvshMLOmLQwJ7kv2TMbaf6t3Xaorj6HjDtobM899HUXOnV3IkOBvLkYCk7VYF2w0bEikbEZ rGFWxZP2x+MMOJcKHJWMuDAVExWUxXngdOPv2dBMP+S7iYzHi8= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Thanks, applied. Is the chosen commit description “Simplify the size argument of kzalloc() memory allocation by using …” really appropriate when calls were adjusted for further two function names by this update suggestion? https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=09e1cf829c45a2f030c7fd49533a86b0935d068a Regards, Markus