From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753806AbdBHKdY (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Feb 2017 05:33:24 -0500 Received: from mail-wr0-f193.google.com ([209.85.128.193]:35995 "EHLO mail-wr0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752206AbdBHKbR (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Feb 2017 05:31:17 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: x86: cleanup and speedup for APICv To: =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= References: <1482164232-130035-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20170207215217.GG31091@potion> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <6d7ba1e5-5da0-f2ea-bc73-c6b04a055a9b@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 11:04:49 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170207215217.GG31091@potion> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/02/2017 22:52, Radim Krčmář wrote: > there might be some rough > edges with nested, but it was broken even before, and they fix at least > one known bug. I don't think so, nested IRQ injection is tested very well. Why do you say it was broken even before? Paolo