mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
To: Jagadeesh Yalapalli <jagadeesharm14@gmail.com>,
	Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jagadeesh <jagadeesh.yalapalli@einfochips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] e1000e: Replace schedule_work with delayed workqueue for watchdog.
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 11:34:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6da97f7e-2311-4658-b745-f8a29057b244@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250508061439.8900-1-jagadeesharm14@gmail.com>

On 5/8/25 08:14, Jagadeesh Yalapalli wrote:
> From: Jagadeesh <jagadeesh.yalapalli@einfochips.com>
> 
>      Replace direct schedule_work() usage with queue_delayed_work() to allow
>      better timing control for the watchdog task. This resolves potential
>      race conditions during interface reset operations.
> 
>      - Added watchdog_wq workqueue_struct and watchdog_dq delayed_work
>      - Updated e1000_watchdog() to use queue_delayed_work()
>      - Removed obsolete TODO comment about delayed workqueue
> 
>      Tested in Qemu :
>      / # for i in {1..1000}; do
>      >     echo 1 > /sys/class/net/eth0/device/reset
>      >     sleep 0.1
>      > done
>      [  726.357499] e1000e 0000:00:02.0: resetting
>      [  726.390737] e1000e 0000:00:02.0: reset done
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jagadeesh <jagadeesh.yalapalli@einfochips.com>

Thank you for your contribution.
Please use at least two parts for the author and signoff

> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h  | 2 ++
>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 3 +--
>   2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h
> index ba9c19e6994c..1e7b365c4f31 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h
> @@ -194,6 +194,8 @@ struct e1000_adapter {
>   	struct timer_list blink_timer;
>   
>   	struct work_struct reset_task;
> +	struct workqueue_struct *watchdog_wq;
> +	struct delayed_work watchdog_dq;
>   	struct work_struct watchdog_task;
>   
>   	const struct e1000_info *ei;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> index 8ebcb6a7d608..87a915d09f4e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> @@ -5178,9 +5178,8 @@ static void e1000_watchdog(struct timer_list *t)
>   	struct e1000_adapter *adapter = from_timer(adapter, t, watchdog_timer);
>   
>   	/* Do the rest outside of interrupt context */
> -	schedule_work(&adapter->watchdog_task);
> +	queue_delayed_work(adapter->watchdog_wq, &adapter->watchdog_dq, 0);

there is no much point in using queue_delayed_work() with the delay of 0

please also note that the last commit touching this function was
essentially just reverting the use of delayed work, see commit
d5ad7a6a7f3c ("e1000e: Revert "e1000e: Make watchdog use delayed work"")

would be best to understand what was wrong with the reverted commit

>   
> -	/* TODO: make this use queue_delayed_work() */
>   }
>   
>   static void e1000_watchdog_task(struct work_struct *work)


  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-08  9:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-08  6:14 Jagadeesh Yalapalli
2025-05-08  9:34 ` Przemek Kitszel [this message]
2025-05-08 16:39 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Paul Menzel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6da97f7e-2311-4658-b745-f8a29057b244@intel.com \
    --to=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jagadeesh.yalapalli@einfochips.com \
    --cc=jagadeesharm14@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®