mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Backlund <tmb@mageia.org>
To: Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de>, Thomas Backlund <tmb@mageia.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 5.1.9 build failure with CONFIG_NOUVEAU_LEGACY_CTX_SUPPORT=n
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 22:58:55 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6ddf2c2d-7078-ffab-ac8c-2b0295f8d12f@mageia.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877e9rkiwb.fsf@turtle.gmx.de>


Den 11-06-2019 kl. 22:43, skrev Sven Joachim:
> On 2019-06-11 22:08 +0300, Thomas Backlund wrote:
>
>> Den 11-06-2019 kl. 20:40, skrev Greg Kroah-Hartman:
>>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 07:33:16PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 5:37 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
>>>> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 03:56:35PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>>>>> Commit 1e07d63749 ("drm/nouveau: add kconfig option to turn off nouveau
>>>>>> legacy contexts. (v3)") has caused a build failure for me when I
>>>>>> actually tried that option (CONFIG_NOUVEAU_LEGACY_CTX_SUPPORT=n):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ,----
>>>>>> | Kernel: arch/x86/boot/bzImage is ready  (#1)
>>>>>> |   Building modules, stage 2.
>>>>>> |   MODPOST 290 modules
>>>>>> | ERROR: "drm_legacy_mmap" [drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau.ko] undefined!
>>>>>> | scripts/Makefile.modpost:91: recipe for target '__modpost' failed
>>>>>> `----
>>>> Calling drm_legacy_mmap is definitely not a great idea. I think either
>>>> we need a custom patch to remove that out on older kernels, or maybe
>>>> even #ifdef if you want to be super paranoid about breaking stuff ...
>>>>
>>>>>> Upstream does not have that problem, as commit bed2dd8421 ("drm/ttm:
>>>>>> Quick-test mmap offset in ttm_bo_mmap()") has removed the use of
>>>>>> drm_legacy_mmap from nouveau_ttm.c.  Unfortunately that commit does not
>>>>>> apply in 5.1.9.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Most likely 4.19.50 and 4.14.125 are also affected, I haven't tested
>>>>>> them yet.
>>>>> They probably are.
>>>>>
>>>>> Should I just revert this patch in the stable tree, or add some other
>>>>> patch (like the one pointed out here, which seems an odd patch for
>>>>> stable...)
>>>> ... or backport the above patch, that should be save to do too. Not
>>>> sure what stable folks prefer?
>>> The above patch does not apply to all of the stable branches, so how
>>> about I just revert this?  People can live with this option not able to
>>> turn off for now, and if they really want it, they can use a newer
>>> kernel, right?
>>>
>> Or add the simple fix suggested by Daniel (if I understand correctly):
>>
>>
>> From: Thomas Backlund <tmb@mageia.org>
>>
>> Setting CONFIG_NOUVEAU_LEGACY_CTX_SUPPORT=n (added by commit:
>> b30a43ac7132) causes the build to fail with:
>>
>> ERROR: "drm_legacy_mmap" [drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau.ko] undefined!
>>
>> Fix that by adding check for CONFIG_NOUVEAU_LEGACY_CTX_SUPPORT around
>> the code using drm_legacy_mmap()
>>
>> Fixes: b30a43ac7132 drm/nouveau: add kconfig option to turn off
>> nouveau legacy contexts. (v3)
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Backlund <tmb@mageia.org>
>>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c |    2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c
>> @@ -168,8 +168,10 @@ nouveau_ttm_mmap(struct file *filp, stru
>>   	struct drm_file *file_priv = filp->private_data;
>>   	struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_drm(file_priv->minor->dev);
>>
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_NOUVEAU_LEGACY_CTX_SUPPORT)
>>   	if (unlikely(vma->vm_pgoff < DRM_FILE_PAGE_OFFSET))
>>   		return drm_legacy_mmap(filp, vma);
>> +#endif
>>
>>   	return ttm_bo_mmap(filp, vma, &drm->ttm.bdev);
>>   }
> That's not quite correct, I am afraid.  If
> CONFIG_NOUVEAU_LEGACY_CTX_SUPPORT is not defined, you still need to do
> the test, but return -EINVAL.  Something along these lines:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c
> index 1543c2f8d3d3..05d513d54555 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c
> @@ -169,7 +169,11 @@ nouveau_ttm_mmap(struct file *filp, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>   	struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_drm(file_priv->minor->dev);
>
>   	if (unlikely(vma->vm_pgoff < DRM_FILE_PAGE_OFFSET))
> +#if defined(CONFIG_NOUVEAU_LEGACY_CTX_SUPPORT)
>   		return drm_legacy_mmap(filp, vma);
> +#else
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +#endif
>
>   	return ttm_bo_mmap(filp, vma, &drm->ttm.bdev);
>   }
>
>
> At least that builds for me, need to reboot to check whether it works.
>
> Cheers,
>         Sven


Ah, indeed. thats what basically all other drivers did before bed2dd8421 
("drm/ttm:
Quick-test mmap offset in ttm_bo_mmap()"), and in that commit the same 
check
was moved to drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c


--

Thomas



  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-11 19:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-11 13:56 Sven Joachim
2019-06-11 15:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-06-11 17:33   ` Daniel Vetter
2019-06-11 17:40     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-06-11 19:08       ` Thomas Backlund
2019-06-11 19:42         ` Daniel Vetter
2019-06-11 19:43         ` Sven Joachim
2019-06-11 19:58           ` Thomas Backlund [this message]
2019-06-11 19:39       ` Daniel Vetter
2019-06-13  7:42       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-06-15 10:21         ` Thomas Backlund
2019-06-15 15:27           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-06-11 18:53     ` Sven Joachim
2019-06-11 19:41       ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6ddf2c2d-7078-ffab-ac8c-2b0295f8d12f@mageia.org \
    --to=tmb@mageia.org \
    --cc=airlied@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=svenjoac@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®