Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci: Fix incorrect switch to HS mode

[Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>]

On 28/11/19 10:21 AM, Faiz Abbas wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 19/09/19 5:27 PM, Alan Cooper wrote:
>> This does correct the sequence of switching to HS400 but it might be
>> safest to just add this to the latest until it gets a little testing
>> to make sure it doesn't expose some bug in existing controllers.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Al
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:52 AM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 13:51, Al Cooper <alcooperx@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> When switching from any MMC speed mode that requires 1.8v
>>>> (HS200, HS400 and HS400ES) to High Speed (HS) mode, the system
>>>> ends up configured for SDR12 with a 50MHz clock which is an illegal
>>>> mode.
>>>>
>>>> This happens because the SDHCI_CTRL_VDD_180 bit in the
>>>> SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2 register is left set and when this bit is
>>>> set, the speed mode is controlled by the SDHCI_CTRL_UHS field
>>>> in the SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2 register. The SDHCI_CTRL_UHS field
>>>> will end up being set to 0 (SDR12) by sdhci_set_uhs_signaling()
>>>> because there is no UHS mode being set.
>>>>
>>>> The fix is to change sdhci_set_uhs_signaling() to set the
>>>> SDHCI_CTRL_UHS field to SDR25 (which is the same as HS) for
>>>> any switch to HS mode.
> 
> This change has broken High speed mode in SD card for me in AM65x-evm. I
> guess this change only needs to be done for eMMC. SDR25 is decidedly not
> the same as high speed for SD card.

Shall we revert c894e33ddc1910e14d6f2a2016f60ab613fd8b37 and then Alan
could send a patch providing the desired behaviour in ->set_uhs_signaling()
of the relevant driver e.g.

void ???_set_uhs_signaling(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int timing)
{
	if (timing == MMC_TIMING_SD_HS || timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS)
		timing = MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR25;
	sdhci_set_uhs_signaling(host, timing);
}