From: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
Arnaud POULIQUEN - foss <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
"linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com"
<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
"linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [Linux-stm32] [PATCH] rpmsg: char: return an error if device already open
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 10:13:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6de9ff8f-0be1-387a-df7e-7d77dd859513@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210114190543.GB255481@xps15>
Hi Mathieu,
On 1/14/21 8:05 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 02:37:14PM +0100, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
>> The rpmsg_create_ept function is invoked when the device is opened.
>> As only one endpoint must be created per device. It is not
>> possible to open the same device twice.
>> The fix consists in returning -EBUSY when device is already
>> opened.
>>
>> Fixes: c0cdc19f84a4 ("rpmsg: Driver for user space endpoint interface")
>> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
>> index 4bbbacdbf3bb..360a1ab0a9c4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
>> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
>> @@ -127,6 +127,9 @@ static int rpmsg_eptdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>> struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = eptdev->rpdev;
>> struct device *dev = &eptdev->dev;
>>
>> + if (eptdev->ept)
>> + return -EBUSY;
>> +
>
> I rarely had to work so hard to review a 2 line patch...
That means that my commit description was not enough explicit...
>
> As far as I can tell the actual code is doing the right thing. If user space is
> trying to open the same eptdev more than once function rpmsg_create_ept() should
> complain and the operation denied, wich is what the current code is doing.
>
> There is currently two customers for this API - SMD and GLINK. The SMD code is
> quite clear that if the channel is already open, the operation will be
> denied [1]. The GLINK code isn't as clear but the fact that it returns NULL on
> error conditions [2] is a good indication that things are working the same way.
>
> What kind of use case are you looking to address? Is there any way you can use
> rpdev->ops->create_ept() as it is currently done?
This patch was part of the IOCTL rpmsg series. I sent it separately at Bjorn's
request [1].
I detect the issue using the RPMSG_ADDR_ANY for the source address when tested
it with the rpmsf_virtio bus. In this case at each sys open of the device, a new
endpoint is created because a new source address is allocated.
[1]https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/patch/20201222105726.16906-11-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com/
Thanks,
Arnaud
>
> Thanks,
> Mathieu
>
> [1]. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.11-rc3/source/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_smd.c#L920
> [2]. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.11-rc3/source/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c#L1149
>
>> get_device(dev);
>>
>> ept = rpmsg_create_ept(rpdev, rpmsg_ept_cb, eptdev, eptdev->chinfo);
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-stm32 mailing list
> Linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
> https://st-md-mailman.stormreply.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-stm32
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-15 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-06 13:37 Arnaud Pouliquen
2021-01-14 19:05 ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-01-15 9:13 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN [this message]
2021-01-19 16:00 ` [Linux-stm32] " Mathieu Poirier
2021-01-25 15:31 ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-01-25 17:19 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6de9ff8f-0be1-387a-df7e-7d77dd859513@st.com \
--to=arnaud.pouliquen@st.com \
--cc=arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®