mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	Arnaud POULIQUEN - foss <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
	"linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com" 
	<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
	"linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [Linux-stm32] [PATCH] rpmsg: char: return an error if device already open
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 10:13:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6de9ff8f-0be1-387a-df7e-7d77dd859513@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210114190543.GB255481@xps15>

Hi Mathieu,


On 1/14/21 8:05 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 02:37:14PM +0100, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
>> The rpmsg_create_ept function is invoked when the device is opened.
>> As only one endpoint must be created per device. It is not
>> possible to open the same device twice.
>> The fix consists in returning -EBUSY when device is already
>> opened.
>>
>> Fixes: c0cdc19f84a4 ("rpmsg: Driver for user space endpoint interface")
>> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c | 3 +++
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
>> index 4bbbacdbf3bb..360a1ab0a9c4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
>> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
>> @@ -127,6 +127,9 @@ static int rpmsg_eptdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>>  	struct rpmsg_device *rpdev = eptdev->rpdev;
>>  	struct device *dev = &eptdev->dev;
>>  
>> +	if (eptdev->ept)
>> +		return -EBUSY;
>> +
> 
> I rarely had to work so hard to review a 2 line patch...

That means that my commit description was not enough explicit...

> 
> As far as I can tell the actual code is doing the right thing.  If user space is
> trying to open the same eptdev more than once function rpmsg_create_ept() should
> complain and the operation denied, wich is what the current code is doing.  
> 
> There is currently two customers for this API - SMD and GLINK.  The SMD code is
> quite clear that if the channel is already open, the operation will be
> denied [1].  The GLINK code isn't as clear but the fact that it returns NULL on
> error conditions [2] is a good indication that things are working the same way.
> 
> What kind of use case are you looking to address?  Is there any way you can use
> rpdev->ops->create_ept() as it is currently done?

This patch was part of the IOCTL rpmsg series. I sent it separately at Bjorn's
request [1].

I detect the issue using the RPMSG_ADDR_ANY for the source address when tested
it with the rpmsf_virtio bus. In this case at each sys open of the device, a new
endpoint is created because a new source address is allocated.

[1]https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/patch/20201222105726.16906-11-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com/

Thanks,
Arnaud

> 
> Thanks,
> Mathieu
> 
> [1]. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.11-rc3/source/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_smd.c#L920
> [2]. https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.11-rc3/source/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c#L1149
> 
>>  	get_device(dev);
>>  
>>  	ept = rpmsg_create_ept(rpdev, rpmsg_ept_cb, eptdev, eptdev->chinfo);
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-stm32 mailing list
> Linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
> https://st-md-mailman.stormreply.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-stm32
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-15  9:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-06 13:37 Arnaud Pouliquen
2021-01-14 19:05 ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-01-15  9:13   ` Arnaud POULIQUEN [this message]
2021-01-19 16:00     ` [Linux-stm32] " Mathieu Poirier
2021-01-25 15:31     ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-01-25 17:19       ` Arnaud POULIQUEN

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6de9ff8f-0be1-387a-df7e-7d77dd859513@st.com \
    --to=arnaud.pouliquen@st.com \
    --cc=arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=ohad@wizery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®