mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: "Maciej Żenczykowski" <maze@google.com>,
	"Maciej Żenczykowski" <zenczykowski@gmail.com>,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Linux Network Development Mailing List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	BPF Mailing List <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: hashtab - allow BPF_MAP_LOOKUP{,_AND_DELETE}_BATCH with NULL keys/values.
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 13:58:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6df59861-8334-49ac-8dca-2b0bac82f2d7@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250813073955.1775315-1-maze@google.com>



On 8/13/25 12:39 AM, Maciej Żenczykowski wrote:
> BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_AND_DELETE_BATCH keys & values == NULL
> seems like a nice way to simply quickly clear a map.

This will change existing API as users will expect
some error (e.g., -EFAULT) return when keys or values is NULL.

We have a 'flags' field in uapi header in

         struct { /* struct used by BPF_MAP_*_BATCH commands */
                 __aligned_u64   in_batch;       /* start batch,
                                                  * NULL to start from beginning
                                                  */
                 __aligned_u64   out_batch;      /* output: next start batch */
                 __aligned_u64   keys;
                 __aligned_u64   values;
                 __u32           count;          /* input/output:
                                                  * input: # of key/value
                                                  * elements
                                                  * output: # of filled elements
                                                  */
                 __u32           map_fd;
                 __u64           elem_flags;
                 __u64           flags;
         } batch;

we can add a flag in 'flags' like BPF_F_CLEAR_MAP_IF_KV_NULL with a comment
that if keys or values is NULL, the batched elements will be cleared.

>
> BPF_MAP_LOOKUP keys/values == NULL might be useful if we just want
> the values/keys and don't want to bother copying the keys/values...
>
> BPF_MAP_LOOKUP keys & values == NULL might be useful to count
> the number of populated entries.

bpf_map_lookup_elem() does not have flags field, so we probably should not
change existins semantics.

>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
> Signed-off-by: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@google.com>
> ---
>   kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> index 5001131598e5..8fbdd000d9e0 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> @@ -1873,9 +1873,9 @@ __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
>   
>   	rcu_read_unlock();
>   	bpf_enable_instrumentation();
> -	if (bucket_cnt && (copy_to_user(ukeys + total * key_size, keys,
> +	if (bucket_cnt && (ukeys && copy_to_user(ukeys + total * key_size, keys,
>   	    key_size * bucket_cnt) ||
> -	    copy_to_user(uvalues + total * value_size, values,
> +	    uvalues && copy_to_user(uvalues + total * value_size, values,
>   	    value_size * bucket_cnt))) {
>   		ret = -EFAULT;
>   		goto after_loop;


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-08-18 20:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-13  7:39 Maciej Żenczykowski
2025-08-13 20:46 ` kernel test robot
2025-08-18 20:58 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2025-08-21  4:07   ` Maciej Żenczykowski
     [not found]   ` <CANP3RGcJ06uRUBF=RR6bjqNnxdaSdpBpynGzNTSms0jA-ZpW6w@mail.gmail.com>
2025-08-21 21:48     ` Yonghong Song
2025-08-22 19:00       ` Andrii Nakryiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6df59861-8334-49ac-8dca-2b0bac82f2d7@linux.dev \
    --to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maze@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=zenczykowski@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®