From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751332AbWGZLA0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2006 07:00:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751281AbWGZLA0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2006 07:00:26 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.174]:45344 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751332AbWGZLAZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2006 07:00:25 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=googlemail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=S7L8zqdfnTby5eTeHWZwggpQSjP27EilR0r9CVFMRD2DJuM4TmisytfLe/R3M0eygK3IiLoY9fzLxLUUeAdN+QgU0Jhxd8VLK2JHUSbQNGCE9dc8r5hsy70TSK1nxfLysC962ARr5Vm3iXOVJK/Hkf+wtYWgnwi1wcA4HeMXthc= Message-ID: <6e0cfd1d0607260400r731489a1tfd9e6c5a197fb0bd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:00:23 +0200 From: "Martin Schwidefsky" To: "Rik van Riel" Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: inactive-clean list Cc: "Peter Zijlstra" , linux-mm , "Linus Torvalds" , "Andrew Morton" , linux-kernel In-Reply-To: <44C30E33.2090402@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1153167857.31891.78.camel@lappy> <44C30E33.2090402@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/23/06, Rik van Riel wrote: > Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > This patch implements the inactive_clean list spoken of during the VM summit. > > The LRU tail pages will be unmapped and ready to free, but not freeed. > > This gives reclaim an extra chance. > > This patch makes it possible to implement Martin Schwidefsky's > hypervisor-based fast page reclaiming for architectures without > millicode - ie. Xen, UML and all other non-s390 architectures. Hmm, I wonder how the inactive clean list helps in regard to the fast host reclaim scheme. In particular since the memory pressure that triggers the reclaim is in the host, not in the guest. So all pages might be on the active list but the host still wants to be able to discard pages. -- blue skies, Martin