mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: Chaohai Chen <wdhh6@aliyun.com>,
	James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, bvanassche@acm.org,
	hch@infradead.org
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] scsi: core: Fix async_scan race condition with READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2026 17:32:22 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6e162686-baa1-46da-aae6-07ec42d25e90@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260304075712.3039960-1-wdhh6@aliyun.com>

On 3/4/26 16:57, Chaohai Chen wrote:
> Previously, host_lock was used to prevent bit-set conflicts in async_scan,
> but this approach introduced naked reads in some code paths.
> 
> Convert async_scan from a bitfield to a bool type to eliminate bit-level
> conflicts entirely. Use READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() to ensure proper
> memory ordering on Alpha and satisfy KCSAN requirements.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chaohai Chen <wdhh6@aliyun.com>
> ---
> 
> v1->v3:
> use READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() to fix the issue (Christoph Hellwig, Damien Le Moal)
> 
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260302121343.1630837-1-wdhh6@aliyun.com/
> 
>  drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
>  include/scsi/scsi_host.h |  6 +++---
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> index 60c06fa4ec32..892be54dacc6 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
> @@ -1298,7 +1298,7 @@ static int scsi_probe_and_add_lun(struct scsi_target *starget,
>  		goto out_free_result;
>  	}
>  
> -	res = scsi_add_lun(sdev, result, &bflags, shost->async_scan);
> +	res = scsi_add_lun(sdev, result, &bflags, READ_ONCE(shost->async_scan));
>  	if (res == SCSI_SCAN_LUN_PRESENT) {
>  		if (bflags & BLIST_KEY) {
>  			sdev->lockable = 0;
> @@ -1629,7 +1629,7 @@ struct scsi_device *__scsi_add_device(struct Scsi_Host *shost, uint channel,
>  	scsi_autopm_get_target(starget);
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&shost->scan_mutex);
> -	if (!shost->async_scan)
> +	if (!READ_ONCE(shost->async_scan))
>  		scsi_complete_async_scans();
>  
>  	if (scsi_host_scan_allowed(shost) && scsi_autopm_get_host(shost) == 0) {
> @@ -1839,7 +1839,7 @@ void scsi_scan_target(struct device *parent, unsigned int channel,
>  		return;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&shost->scan_mutex);
> -	if (!shost->async_scan)
> +	if (!READ_ONCE(shost->async_scan))
>  		scsi_complete_async_scans();
>  
>  	if (scsi_host_scan_allowed(shost) && scsi_autopm_get_host(shost) == 0) {
> @@ -1896,7 +1896,7 @@ int scsi_scan_host_selected(struct Scsi_Host *shost, unsigned int channel,
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&shost->scan_mutex);
> -	if (!shost->async_scan)
> +	if (!READ_ONCE(shost->async_scan))
>  		scsi_complete_async_scans();
>  
>  	if (scsi_host_scan_allowed(shost) && scsi_autopm_get_host(shost) == 0) {
> @@ -1943,13 +1943,12 @@ static void scsi_sysfs_add_devices(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
>  static struct async_scan_data *scsi_prep_async_scan(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
>  {
>  	struct async_scan_data *data = NULL;
> -	unsigned long flags;
>  
>  	if (strncmp(scsi_scan_type, "sync", 4) == 0)
>  		return NULL;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&shost->scan_mutex);
> -	if (shost->async_scan) {
> +	if (READ_ONCE(shost->async_scan)) {
>  		shost_printk(KERN_DEBUG, shost, "%s called twice\n", __func__);
>  		goto err;
>  	}
> @@ -1962,9 +1961,7 @@ static struct async_scan_data *scsi_prep_async_scan(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
>  		goto err;
>  	init_completion(&data->prev_finished);
>  
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
> -	shost->async_scan = 1;
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
> +	WRITE_ONCE(shost->async_scan, true);
>  	mutex_unlock(&shost->scan_mutex);
>  
>  	spin_lock(&async_scan_lock);
> @@ -1992,7 +1989,6 @@ static struct async_scan_data *scsi_prep_async_scan(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
>  static void scsi_finish_async_scan(struct async_scan_data *data)
>  {
>  	struct Scsi_Host *shost;
> -	unsigned long flags;
>  
>  	if (!data)
>  		return;
> @@ -2001,7 +1997,7 @@ static void scsi_finish_async_scan(struct async_scan_data *data)
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&shost->scan_mutex);
>  
> -	if (!shost->async_scan) {
> +	if (!READ_ONCE(shost->async_scan)) {
>  		shost_printk(KERN_INFO, shost, "%s called twice\n", __func__);
>  		dump_stack();
>  		mutex_unlock(&shost->scan_mutex);
> @@ -2012,9 +2008,7 @@ static void scsi_finish_async_scan(struct async_scan_data *data)
>  
>  	scsi_sysfs_add_devices(shost);
>  
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
> -	shost->async_scan = 0;
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags);
> +	WRITE_ONCE(shost->async_scan, false);
>  
>  	mutex_unlock(&shost->scan_mutex);
>  
> diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_host.h b/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
> index f6e12565a81d..668ec9a1b33c 100644
> --- a/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
> +++ b/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
> @@ -678,9 +678,6 @@ struct Scsi_Host {
>  	/* Task mgmt function in progress */
>  	unsigned tmf_in_progress:1;
>  
> -	/* Asynchronous scan in progress */
> -	unsigned async_scan:1;
> -
>  	/* Don't resume host in EH */
>  	unsigned eh_noresume:1;
>  
> @@ -699,6 +696,9 @@ struct Scsi_Host {
>  	/* The transport requires the LUN bits NOT to be stored in CDB[1] */
>  	unsigned no_scsi2_lun_in_cdb:1;
>  
> +	/* Asynchronous scan in progress */
> +	bool async_scan;
> +

Please move this before the bit field in the structure to avoid holes.

>  	/*
>  	 * Optional work queue to be utilized by the transport
>  	 */


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-04  8:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-04  7:57 Chaohai Chen
2026-03-04  8:32 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2026-03-04  9:20 ` John Garry
2026-03-04  9:43   ` Chaohai Chen
2026-03-04  9:52     ` Damien Le Moal
2026-03-04  9:55     ` John Garry
2026-03-04 12:21     ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6e162686-baa1-46da-aae6-07ec42d25e90@kernel.org \
    --to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=wdhh6@aliyun.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®