From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Stephen Röttger" <sroettger@google.com>,
peterz@infradead.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, hpa@zytor.com,
aruna.ramakrishna@oracle.com, elver@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] rseq: Make rseq work with protection keys
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 09:25:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6e737bd5-1167-4cc8-96c3-abc3d3598d2d@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACT4Y+b0cdGZwqmZSikxam+ASp9LXMuT9f8iifnmNed+PjamVg@mail.gmail.com>
On 2025-07-18 05:01, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 at 11:17, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote:
>>>> If an application registers rseq, and ever switches to another pkey
>>>> protection (such that the rseq becomes inaccessible), then any
>>>> context switch will cause failure in __rseq_handle_notify_resume()
>>>> attempting to read/write struct rseq and/or rseq_cs. Since context
>>>> switches are asynchronous and are outside of the application control
>>>> (not part of the restricted code scope), temporarily switch to
>>>> pkey value that allows access to the 0 (default) PKEY.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
>>>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>>>> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
>>>> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
>>>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>>>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
>>>> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
>>>> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
>>>> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
>>>> Cc: Aruna Ramakrishna <aruna.ramakrishna@oracle.com>
>>>> Cc: x86@kernel.org
>>>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>>>> Fixes: d7822b1e24f2 ("rseq: Introduce restartable sequences system call")
>>>
>>> Dave, can you please ack this patch? Ingo said he was waiting for your
>>> review before taking this to -tip.
>>
>> Are there any remaining concerns with this series? If not, Thomas,
>> Ingo, can you please take this to -tip tree?
>
> Gentle ping. What needs to happen for this series to be merged?
This series looks OK from my perspective. I think the last piece that
was missing was to get a review from Dave Hansen.
Dave ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
>
>>>> ---
>>>> Changes in v7:
>>>> - Added Mathieu's Reviewed-by
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v6:
>>>> - Added a comment to struct rseq with MPK rules
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v4:
>>>> - Added Fixes tag
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v3:
>>>> - simplify control flow to always enable access to 0 pkey
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v2:
>>>> - fixed typos and reworded the comment
>>>> ---
>>>> include/uapi/linux/rseq.h | 4 ++++
>>>> kernel/rseq.c | 11 +++++++++++
>>>> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/rseq.h b/include/uapi/linux/rseq.h
>>>> index c233aae5eac90..019fd248cf749 100644
>>>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/rseq.h
>>>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/rseq.h
>>>> @@ -58,6 +58,10 @@ struct rseq_cs {
>>>> * contained within a single cache-line.
>>>> *
>>>> * A single struct rseq per thread is allowed.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * If struct rseq or struct rseq_cs is used with Memory Protection Keys,
>>>> + * then the assigned pkey should either be accessible whenever these structs
>>>> + * are registered/installed, or they should be protected with pkey 0.
>>>> */
>>>> struct rseq {
>>>> /*
>>>> diff --git a/kernel/rseq.c b/kernel/rseq.c
>>>> index b7a1ec327e811..88fc8cb789b3b 100644
>>>> --- a/kernel/rseq.c
>>>> +++ b/kernel/rseq.c
>>>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>>>>
>>>> #include <linux/sched.h>
>>>> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/pkeys.h>
>>>> #include <linux/syscalls.h>
>>>> #include <linux/rseq.h>
>>>> #include <linux/types.h>
>>>> @@ -424,11 +425,19 @@ static int rseq_ip_fixup(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>>> void __rseq_handle_notify_resume(struct ksignal *ksig, struct pt_regs *regs)
>>>> {
>>>> struct task_struct *t = current;
>>>> + pkey_reg_t saved_pkey;
>>>> int ret, sig;
>>>>
>>>> if (unlikely(t->flags & PF_EXITING))
>>>> return;
>>>>
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Enable access to the default (0) pkey in case the thread has
>>>> + * currently disabled access to it and struct rseq/rseq_cs has
>>>> + * 0 pkey assigned (the only supported value for now).
>>>> + */
>>>> + saved_pkey = enable_zero_pkey_val();
>>>> +
>>>> /*
>>>> * regs is NULL if and only if the caller is in a syscall path. Skip
>>>> * fixup and leave rseq_cs as is so that rseq_sycall() will detect and
>>>> @@ -441,9 +450,11 @@ void __rseq_handle_notify_resume(struct ksignal *ksig, struct pt_regs *regs)
>>>> }
>>>> if (unlikely(rseq_update_cpu_node_id(t)))
>>>> goto error;
>>>> + write_pkey_val(saved_pkey);
>>>> return;
>>>>
>>>> error:
>>>> + write_pkey_val(saved_pkey);
>>>> sig = ksig ? ksig->sig : 0;
>>>> force_sigsegv(sig);
>>>> }
>>>> --
>>>> 2.49.0.1143.g0be31eac6b-goog
>>>>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-21 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-21 8:47 [PATCH v7 0/4] " Dmitry Vyukov
2025-05-21 8:47 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] pkeys: add API to switch to permissive/zero pkey register Dmitry Vyukov
2025-05-21 8:47 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] x86/signal: Use write_permissive_pkey_val() helper Dmitry Vyukov
2025-05-21 8:47 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] rseq: Make rseq work with protection keys Dmitry Vyukov
2025-05-21 8:59 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2025-06-24 9:17 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2025-07-18 9:01 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2025-07-21 13:25 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2025-07-21 17:41 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-21 15:12 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2025-09-19 13:07 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2025-09-22 13:06 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2025-10-20 13:46 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-26 0:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-26 9:32 ` Florian Weimer
2025-11-26 17:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-26 19:06 ` Florian Weimer
2025-11-26 20:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-11-26 22:06 ` Florian Weimer
2025-11-27 14:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-12-02 19:19 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-05-21 8:47 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] selftests/rseq: Add test for rseq+pkeys Dmitry Vyukov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6e737bd5-1167-4cc8-96c3-abc3d3598d2d@efficios.com \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=aruna.ramakrishna@oracle.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sroettger@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®