From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759841AbdEVNlU (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2017 09:41:20 -0400 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:17938 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759803AbdEVNlS (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2017 09:41:18 -0400 Subject: Re: [v4 1/1] mm: Adaptive hash table scaling To: Michal Hocko Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Michael Ellerman References: <1495300013-653283-1-git-send-email-pasha.tatashin@oracle.com> <1495300013-653283-2-git-send-email-pasha.tatashin@oracle.com> <20170522092910.GD8509@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20170522133834.GL8509@dhcp22.suse.cz> From: Pasha Tatashin Message-ID: <6e81aa26-e43e-6264-e2f9-547531b809f5@oracle.com> Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 09:41:08 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170522133834.GL8509@dhcp22.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-IP: aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > This is just too ugly to live, really. If we do not need adaptive > scaling then just make it #if __BITS_PER_LONG around the code. I would > be fine with this. A big fat warning explaining why this is 64b only > would be appropriate. > OK, let me prettify it somehow, and I will send a new patch out. Pasha