From: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <iommu@lists.linux.dev>
Cc: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>, <sanjay.k.kumar@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Handle volatile descriptor status read
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:54:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6ef4a71b-34b4-4f63-be18-310c31c89d53@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240607173817.3914600-1-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
On 2024/6/8 01:38, Jacob Pan wrote:
> Queued invalidation wait descriptor status is volatile in that IOMMU hardware
> writes the data upon completion.
>
> Use READ_ONCE() to prevent compiler optimizations which ensures memory
> reads every time. As a side effect, READ_ONCE() also enforces strict types and
> may add an extra instruction. But it should not have negative
> performance impact since we use cpu_relax anyway and the extra time(by
> adding an instruction) may allow IOMMU HW request cacheline ownership easier.
>
> e.g. gcc 12.3
> BEFORE:
> 81 38 ad de 00 00 cmpl $0x2,(%rax)
>
> AFTER (with READ_ONCE())
> 772f: 8b 00 mov (%rax),%eax
> 7731: 3d ad de 00 00 cmp $0x2,%eax //status data is 32 bit
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
> index 304e84949ca7..1c8d3141cb55 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
> @@ -1446,7 +1446,7 @@ int qi_submit_sync(struct intel_iommu *iommu, struct qi_desc *desc,
> */
> writel(qi->free_head << shift, iommu->reg + DMAR_IQT_REG);
>
> - while (qi->desc_status[wait_index] != QI_DONE) {
> + while (READ_ONCE(qi->desc_status[wait_index]) != QI_DONE) {
> /*
> * We will leave the interrupts disabled, to prevent interrupt
> * context to queue another cmd while a cmd is already submitted
Reviewed-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
--
Regards,
Yi Liu
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-18 2:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-07 17:38 Jacob Pan
2024-06-17 3:04 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-06-17 21:05 ` Jacob Pan
2024-06-18 2:54 ` Yi Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6ef4a71b-34b4-4f63-be18-310c31c89d53@intel.com \
--to=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sanjay.k.kumar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®