From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>,
maz@kernel.org, oupton@kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, joey.gouly@arm.com,
seiden@linux.ibm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
vdonnefort@google.com, qperret@google.com,
Sascha.Bischoff@arm.com, steven.price@arm.com, tabba@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: arm64: Reject the stage-2 flush hypercalls under pKVM
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 13:03:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6f5dcdd6-21ca-4392-9d6c-fa262a8cf7de@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261011143648.211337-3-fuad.tabba@linux.dev>
On 11/10/2026 15:36, Fuad Tabba wrote:
> The stage-2 TLB and context flush hypercalls remain callable once pKVM
> has finalised, and five of the six dereference a host-supplied
> struct kvm_s2_mmu pointer. Under pKVM none has a valid caller: the host
> walks no guest stage-2, its TLB flushes go through the handle-based
> __pkvm_tlb_flush_vmid, and kvm_arch_vcpu_load() skips both the VMID
> update and the CPU context flush.
>
> Move them into the band the dispatcher rejects once pKVM has finalised.
>
> Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260914130152.F0D5F1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org/
> Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h | 12 ++++++------
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
> index ea319c496bb26..b182c908c1a98 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
> @@ -64,6 +64,12 @@ enum __kvm_host_smccc_func {
> __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___vgic_v3_get_gic_config,
> __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___vgic_v5_save_apr,
> __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___vgic_v5_restore_vmcr_apr,
> + __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_flush_vm_context,
> + __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa,
> + __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa_nsh,
For a moment (pardon my inexperience with pKVM code base) I thought we
could get this called via
pkvm_stage2_relax_perms() ->... kvm_stage2_relax_perms() for the host,
but we are in EL2 already and it is a direct call.
So, yes makes sense to me.
FWIW:
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> + __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_tlb_flush_vmid,
> + __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range,
> + __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_flush_cpu_context,
>
> MARKER(__KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC_MIN_PKVM),
>
> @@ -72,12 +78,6 @@ enum __kvm_host_smccc_func {
> /* Hypercalls that are always available and common to [nh]VHE/pKVM. */
> __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_adjust_pc,
> __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_vcpu_run,
> - __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_flush_vm_context,
> - __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa,
> - __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa_nsh,
> - __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_tlb_flush_vmid,
> - __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range,
> - __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_flush_cpu_context,
> __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_timer_set_cntvoff,
> __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___tracing_load,
> __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___tracing_unload,
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
> index 7c939baf9c1ba..b2657a3c65b40 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
> @@ -913,16 +913,16 @@ static const hcall_t host_hcall[] = {
> HANDLE_FUNC(__vgic_v3_get_gic_config),
> HANDLE_FUNC(__vgic_v5_save_apr),
> HANDLE_FUNC(__vgic_v5_restore_vmcr_apr),
> - HANDLE_FUNC(__pkvm_prot_finalize),
> -
> - HANDLE_FUNC(__kvm_adjust_pc),
> - HANDLE_FUNC(__kvm_vcpu_run),
> HANDLE_FUNC(__kvm_flush_vm_context),
> HANDLE_FUNC(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa),
> HANDLE_FUNC(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa_nsh),
> HANDLE_FUNC(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid),
> HANDLE_FUNC(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range),
> HANDLE_FUNC(__kvm_flush_cpu_context),
> + HANDLE_FUNC(__pkvm_prot_finalize),
> +
> + HANDLE_FUNC(__kvm_adjust_pc),
> + HANDLE_FUNC(__kvm_vcpu_run),
> HANDLE_FUNC(__kvm_timer_set_cntvoff),
> HANDLE_FUNC(__tracing_load),
> HANDLE_FUNC(__tracing_unload),
> @@ -969,7 +969,8 @@ static void handle_host_hcall(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
>
> /*
> * If pKVM has been initialised then reject any calls to the
> - * early "privileged" hypercalls. Note that we cannot reject
> + * early "privileged" hypercalls, and to the ones the host has no
> + * use for in protected mode. Note that we cannot reject
> * calls to __pkvm_prot_finalize for two reasons: (1) The static
> * key used to determine initialisation must be toggled prior to
> * finalisation and (2) finalisation is performed on a per-CPU
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-12 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-11 14:36 [PATCH v2 0/5] KVM: arm64: pKVM host hypercall and GICv5 CPU interface fixes Fuad Tabba
2026-10-11 14:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] KVM: arm64: Reject the GICv5 CPU interface hypercalls under pKVM Fuad Tabba
2026-10-12 10:43 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-11 14:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: arm64: Reject the stage-2 flush " Fuad Tabba
2026-10-12 12:03 ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2026-10-11 14:36 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] KVM: arm64: Validate the host-provided vgic model in pKVM Fuad Tabba
2026-10-12 12:15 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-10-11 14:36 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] KVM: arm64: vgic: Do not access the GICv5 CPU interface from EL1 Fuad Tabba
2026-10-11 15:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-10-11 15:26 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-10-11 14:36 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: arm64: Fix stale VGICv3 comments in the nVHE world switch Fuad Tabba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6f5dcdd6-21ca-4392-9d6c-fa262a8cf7de@arm.com \
--to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=Sascha.Bischoff@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®