mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
To: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, farman@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] KVM: s390: pci: Fix memory accounting for pinned/unpinned pages
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 10:12:09 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6f87bda7-8a8a-4f93-907c-6e0a442c8ceb@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260722170621.1686-3-alifm@linux.ibm.com>

On 7/22/26 1:06 PM, Farhan Ali wrote:
> The account_mem() and unaccount_mem() functions call get_uid() which
> increments the reference count of struct user_struct on every invocation.
> But we don't decrement the count by calling free_uid(). It also
> accounted/unaccounted the pages against the current->mm. But its possible
> the unaccount_mem() can be called from a different process context than the
> one that originally pinned the pages.
> 
> Let's fix this by storing the pinning process user_struct and mm_struct
> when accounting for pinned pages, and subsequently free these resources
> when the pages are unpinned.
> 
> Fixes: 3c5a1b6f0a18 ("KVM: s390: pci: provide routines for enabling/disabling interrupt forwarding")
> Signed-off-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/s390/kvm/pci.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  arch/s390/kvm/pci.h |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/pci.c b/arch/s390/kvm/pci.c
> index d2a11cdf6941..1b3114c7cfbb 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/pci.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/pci.c
> @@ -190,33 +190,51 @@ static int kvm_zpci_clear_airq(struct zpci_dev *zdev)
>  	return cc ? -EIO : 0;
>  }
>  
> -static inline void unaccount_mem(unsigned long nr_pages)
> +static inline void unaccount_mem(struct kvm_zdev *kzdev, unsigned long nr_pages)
>  {
> -	struct user_struct *user = get_uid(current_user());
> +	struct user_struct *user = kzdev->user_account;
> +	struct mm_struct *mm_account = kzdev->mm_account;
>  
> -	if (user)
> +	if (user) {
>  		atomic_long_sub(nr_pages, &user->locked_vm);
> -	if (current->mm)
> -		atomic64_sub(nr_pages, &current->mm->pinned_vm);

Previous code handled the case where current->mm could be NULL...

> +		free_uid(user);
> +		kzdev->user_account = NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (mm_account) {

... And you check for kzdev->mm_account being NULL here...

> +		atomic64_sub(nr_pages, &mm_account->pinned_vm);
> +		mmdrop(mm_account);
> +		kzdev->mm_account = NULL;
> +	}
>  }
>  
> -static inline int account_mem(unsigned long nr_pages)
> +static inline int account_mem(struct kvm_zdev *kzdev, unsigned long nr_pages)
>  {
>  	struct user_struct *user = get_uid(current_user());
>  	unsigned long page_limit, cur_pages, new_pages;
> +	int rc = 0;
>  
>  	page_limit = rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  
>  	cur_pages = atomic_long_read(&user->locked_vm);
>  	do {
>  		new_pages = cur_pages + nr_pages;
> -		if (new_pages > page_limit)
> -			return -ENOMEM;
> +		if (new_pages > page_limit) {
> +			rc =  -ENOMEM;
> +			goto out;
> +		}
>  	} while (!atomic_long_try_cmpxchg(&user->locked_vm, &cur_pages, new_pages));
>  
> +	mmgrab(current->mm);

... But here you do not check if current->mm is NULL.  I'm not sure if
it will happen in practice, but we did guard against it before this
patch.  Just add if (!current->mm) around this mmgrab?

>  	atomic64_add(nr_pages, &current->mm->pinned_vm);
> +	kzdev->user_account = user;
> +	kzdev->mm_account = current->mm;

Then if it IS NULL, we will stash a NULL into kzdev->mm_account here and
handle it above as before with the if (mm_account) check.

>  
>  	return 0;
> +
> +out:
> +	free_uid(user);
> +	return rc;
>  }
>  
>  static int kvm_s390_pci_aif_enable(struct zpci_dev *zdev, struct zpci_fib *fib,
> @@ -279,7 +297,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_pci_aif_enable(struct zpci_dev *zdev, struct zpci_fib *fib,
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Account for pinned pages, roll back on failure */
> -	if (account_mem(pcount))
> +	if (account_mem(zdev->kzdev, pcount))
>  		goto unpin2;
>  
>  	/* AISB must be allocated before we can fill in GAITE */
> @@ -400,7 +418,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_pci_aif_disable(struct zpci_dev *zdev, bool force)
>  		pcount++;
>  	}
>  	if (pcount > 0)
> -		unaccount_mem(pcount);
> +		unaccount_mem(kzdev, pcount);
>  out:
>  	mutex_unlock(&aift->aift_lock);
>  
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/pci.h b/arch/s390/kvm/pci.h
> index ff0972dd5e71..544e6aa75e38 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/pci.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/pci.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ struct kvm_zdev {
>  	struct zpci_dev *zdev;
>  	struct kvm *kvm;
>  	struct zpci_fib fib;
> +	struct user_struct *user_account;
> +	struct mm_struct *mm_account;
>  	struct list_head entry;
>  };
>  


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-23 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-22 17:06 [PATCH v4 0/6] KVM s390x PCI fixes Farhan Ali
2026-07-22 17:06 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] KVM: s390: pci: Reject adapter interrupt forwarding if already enabled Farhan Ali
2026-07-23  6:57   ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-23 14:11   ` Matthew Rosato
2026-07-22 17:06 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] KVM: s390: pci: Fix memory accounting for pinned/unpinned pages Farhan Ali
2026-07-23 12:08   ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-23 14:12   ` Matthew Rosato [this message]
2026-07-23 17:08     ` Farhan Ali
2026-07-23 17:31       ` Matthew Rosato
2026-07-22 17:06 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] KVM: s390: pci: Fix missing error codes and memory unaccounting Farhan Ali
2026-07-23  7:34   ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-23 14:15   ` Matthew Rosato
2026-07-22 17:06 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] KVM: s390: pci: Fix NULL dereference on AIBV allocation failure Farhan Ali
2026-07-23  8:18   ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-23 14:20   ` Matthew Rosato
2026-07-22 17:06 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] KVM: s390: pci: Fix resource leak on IRQ registration failure Farhan Ali
2026-07-23 12:17   ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-23 15:19   ` Matthew Rosato
2026-07-23 16:55     ` Farhan Ali
2026-07-22 17:06 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] KVM: s390: pci: Validate AIBV and AISB before pinning guest pages Farhan Ali
2026-07-23 12:19   ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-23 15:35   ` Matthew Rosato
2026-07-23 12:59 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] KVM s390x PCI fixes Christian Borntraeger
2026-07-23 13:00   ` Matthew Rosato
2026-07-23 15:35     ` Matthew Rosato
2026-07-23 16:38       ` Farhan Ali

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6f87bda7-8a8a-4f93-907c-6e0a442c8ceb@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome