From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.com>,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
youlin.pei@mediatek.com, Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
anan.sun@mediatek.com, chao.hao@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iommu/mediatek-v1: Alloc building as module
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 17:42:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6fb1f2b1-3b85-ee91-a447-8aca8f4057d6@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210325171614.GA15433@willie-the-truck>
^^Nit: presumably you meant "Allow" in the subject.
On 2021-03-25 17:16, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 01:58:00PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote:
>> This patch only adds support for building the IOMMU-v1 driver as module.
>> Correspondingly switch the config to tristate.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
>> ---
>> rebase on v5.12-rc2.
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/Kconfig | 2 +-
>> drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu_v1.c | 9 ++++-----
>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> Both of these patches look fine to me, but you probably need to check
> the setting of MODULE_OWNER after:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/f4de29d8330981301c1935e667b507254a2691ae.1616157612.git.robin.murphy@arm.com
Right, furthermore I would rather expect these patches on their own to
hit the problem that my patch tries to avoid - where since mtk_iommu_ops
is const, the current version of iommu_device_set_ops() is liable to
blow up trying to write to rodata.
In fact I do wonder a little why that wasn't happening already - maybe
the compiler is clever enough to tell that the assignment is redundant
when THIS_MODULE == 0, and elides it :/
Robin.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-25 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-23 5:58 Yong Wu
2021-03-23 5:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] iommu/mediatek: " Yong Wu
2021-03-25 17:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] iommu/mediatek-v1: " Will Deacon
2021-03-25 17:42 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6fb1f2b1-3b85-ee91-a447-8aca8f4057d6@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=anan.sun@mediatek.com \
--cc=chao.hao@mediatek.com \
--cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
--cc=tfiga@chromium.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
--cc=youlin.pei@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®