mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: <axboe@kernel.dk>, <paolo.valente@linaro.org>,
	<fchecconi@gmail.com>, <avanzini.arianna@gmail.com>,
	<mkoutny@suse.com>, <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -next] blk-cgroup: synchoronize blkg creation against policy deactivation
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:48:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6fc9eaa8-c367-f458-4ed9-94af60b55ca0@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YWi27oAU0v5v86eN@slm.duckdns.org>

On 2021/10/15 7:02, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 08:44:56PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
>> @@ -1401,6 +1406,7 @@ void blkcg_deactivate_policy(struct request_queue *q,
>>   	if (queue_is_mq(q))
>>   		blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);
>>   
>> +	mutex_lock(&q->blkg_lock);
>>   	spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
> 
> Given that deactivation drains q_usage_counter through
> blk_mq_freeze_queue(), can't the blkg_conf_prep() just pin the usage count?
> 

In fact, the caller of blkcg_deactivate_policy() aready freeze the
queue, either from blk_cleanup_queue() or from elevator_switch().

Grab q_usage_counter in blk_conf_prep() can prevent concurrent with
blkcg_deactivate_policy(), I'm afraid will it be too much since it
will also be synchoronized with all the other freeze/unfreeze queues?

Thanks,
Kuai

      reply	other threads:[~2021-10-15  1:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-13 12:44 Yu Kuai
2021-10-14 23:02 ` Tejun Heo
2021-10-15  1:48   ` yukuai (C) [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6fc9eaa8-c367-f458-4ed9-94af60b55ca0@huawei.com \
    --to=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    --cc=avanzini.arianna@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=fchecconi@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®