mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>
To: Yojana Mallik <y-mallik@ti.com>
Cc: <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>, <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	<diogo.ivo@siemens.com>, <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	<horms@kernel.org>, <vigneshr@ti.com>, <rogerq@ti.com>,
	<danishanwar@ti.com>, <pabeni@redhat.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
	<edumazet@google.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<srk@ti.com>, <rogerq@kernel.org>, <s-vadapalli@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net: ethernet: ti: Register the RPMsg driver as network device
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2024 13:05:11 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <70166bc4-2c55-4a46-b442-4a3c49d6d64d@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240531064006.1223417-3-y-mallik@ti.com>

On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 12:10:05PM +0530, Yojana Mallik wrote:
> Register the RPMsg driver as network device and add support for
> basic ethernet functionality by using the shared memory for data
> plane.
> 
> The shared memory layout is as below, with the region between
> PKT_1_LEN to PKT_N modelled as circular buffer.
> 
> -------------------------
> |          HEAD         |
> -------------------------
> |          TAIL         |
> -------------------------
> |       PKT_1_LEN       |
> |         PKT_1         |
> -------------------------
> |       PKT_2_LEN       |
> |         PKT_2         |
> -------------------------
> |           .           |
> |           .           |
> -------------------------
> |       PKT_N_LEN       |
> |         PKT_N         |
> -------------------------
> 
> The offset between the HEAD and TAIL is polled to process the Rx packets.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yojana Mallik <y-mallik@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/ti/icve_rpmsg_common.h   |  86 ++++
>  drivers/net/ethernet/ti/inter_core_virt_eth.c | 453 +++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/net/ethernet/ti/inter_core_virt_eth.h |  35 +-
>  3 files changed, 570 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/icve_rpmsg_common.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/icve_rpmsg_common.h
> index 7cd157479d4d..2e3833de14bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/icve_rpmsg_common.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/icve_rpmsg_common.h
> @@ -15,14 +15,58 @@ enum icve_msg_type {
>  	ICVE_NOTIFY_MSG,
>  };

[...]

>  
>  #endif /* __ICVE_RPMSG_COMMON_H__ */
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/inter_core_virt_eth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/inter_core_virt_eth.c
> index bea822d2373a..d96547d317fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/inter_core_virt_eth.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/inter_core_virt_eth.c
> @@ -6,11 +6,145 @@
>  
>  #include "inter_core_virt_eth.h"

[...]

>  
> +static int create_request(struct icve_common *common,
> +			  enum icve_rpmsg_type rpmsg_type)
> +{
> +	struct message *msg = &common->send_msg;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	msg->msg_hdr.src_id = common->port->port_id;
> +	msg->req_msg.type = rpmsg_type;
> +
> +	switch (rpmsg_type) {
> +	case ICVE_REQ_SHM_INFO:
> +		msg->msg_hdr.msg_type = ICVE_REQUEST_MSG;
> +		break;
> +	case ICVE_REQ_SET_MAC_ADDR:
> +		msg->msg_hdr.msg_type = ICVE_REQUEST_MSG;
> +		ether_addr_copy(msg->req_msg.mac_addr.addr,
> +				common->port->ndev->dev_addr);
> +		break;
> +	case ICVE_NOTIFY_PORT_UP:
> +	case ICVE_NOTIFY_PORT_DOWN:
> +		msg->msg_hdr.msg_type = ICVE_NOTIFY_MSG;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		dev_err(common->dev, "Invalid RPMSG request\n");
> +	};
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int icve_create_send_request(struct icve_common *common,
> +				    enum icve_rpmsg_type rpmsg_type,
> +				    bool wait)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (wait)
> +		reinit_completion(&common->sync_msg);
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&common->send_msg_lock, flags);
> +	create_request(common, rpmsg_type);

Why isn't the return value of create_request() being checked?
If it is guaranteed to always return 0 based on the design, convert it
to a void function.

> +	rpmsg_send(common->rpdev->ept, (void *)(&common->send_msg),
> +		   sizeof(common->send_msg));
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&common->send_msg_lock, flags);
> +
> +	if (wait) {
> +		ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&common->sync_msg,
> +						  ICVE_REQ_TIMEOUT);
> +
> +		if (!ret) {
> +			dev_err(common->dev, "Failed to receive response within %ld jiffies\n",
> +				ICVE_REQ_TIMEOUT);
> +			ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void icve_state_machine(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> +	struct delayed_work *dwork = to_delayed_work(work);
> +	struct icve_common *common;
> +	struct icve_port *port;
> +
> +	common = container_of(dwork, struct icve_common, state_work);
> +	port = common->port;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&common->state_lock);
> +
> +	switch (common->state) {
> +	case ICVE_STATE_PROBE:
> +		break;
> +	case ICVE_STATE_OPEN:
> +		icve_create_send_request(common, ICVE_REQ_SHM_INFO, false);

The return value of icve_create_send_request() is not being checked. Is
it guaranteed to succeed? Where is the error handling path if
icve_create_send_request() fails?

> +		break;
> +	case ICVE_STATE_CLOSE:
> +		break;
> +	case ICVE_STATE_READY:
> +		icve_create_send_request(common, ICVE_REQ_SET_MAC_ADDR, false);

Same here and at all other places where icve_create_send_request() is
being invoked. The icve_create_send_request() seems to be newly added in
this version of the series and wasn't there in the RFC patch. This should
be mentioned in the Changelog.

[...]

Regards,
Siddharth.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-06-02  7:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-31  6:40 [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] Introducing Intercore Virtual Ethernet (ICVE) driver Yojana Mallik
2024-05-31  6:40 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] net: ethernet: ti: RPMsg based shared memory ethernet driver Yojana Mallik
2024-05-31 15:30   ` Randy Dunlap
2024-06-03  5:50     ` Yojana Mallik
2024-06-02  7:01   ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2024-06-03  6:16     ` Yojana Mallik
2024-06-02 16:21   ` Andrew Lunn
2024-06-03  8:56     ` Yojana Mallik
2024-06-03 12:54       ` Andrew Lunn
2024-05-31  6:40 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net: ethernet: ti: Register the RPMsg driver as network device Yojana Mallik
2024-06-01  3:13   ` kernel test robot
2024-06-03  9:26     ` Yojana Mallik
2024-06-02  7:22   ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2024-06-02 15:54     ` Andrew Lunn
2024-06-02  7:35   ` Siddharth Vadapalli [this message]
2024-06-02 16:45   ` Andrew Lunn
2024-06-04  6:23     ` Yojana Mallik
2024-06-04 12:54       ` Andrew Lunn
2024-06-12 12:52         ` Yojana Mallik
2024-06-12 14:59           ` Andrew Lunn
2024-06-14  9:08             ` Yojana Mallik
2024-06-16 16:19               ` Andrew Lunn
2024-06-16 19:03                 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-06-04 13:00       ` Andrew Lunn
2024-06-12 12:49         ` Yojana Mallik
2024-06-12 14:36           ` Andrew Lunn
2024-05-31  6:40 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] net: ethernet: ti: icve: Add support for multicast filtering Yojana Mallik
2024-06-03 21:27   ` kernel test robot
2024-06-02 15:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] Introducing Intercore Virtual Ethernet (ICVE) driver Andrew Lunn
2024-06-03 23:54   ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-12 12:48   ` Yojana Mallik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=70166bc4-2c55-4a46-b442-4a3c49d6d64d@ti.com \
    --to=s-vadapalli@ti.com \
    --cc=danishanwar@ti.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=diogo.ivo@siemens.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rogerq@kernel.org \
    --cc=rogerq@ti.com \
    --cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=srk@ti.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    --cc=y-mallik@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®