From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 375F0399 for ; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 01:25:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709515529; cv=none; b=okRa0AbvWjxMiKGdFzFqjsNhkxW9zhDq1W3auoZlenwY/tu2SoEnOUSeNpsuPsJ2JZMA6fuEMsRSYqYCnPKBOdPzdd1nFJ4Y0Du5afaCPZF0v9uHXOZHwLYV3hf4nr8GGpFMlOEcRHB/bF1TFrNpuSVplOQ+1Znhvcq6Y7JAiko= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709515529; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pbEla8fsO5S9tFM5YQ5Jg2RZxp5KAhMIEyBCKb7QDe4=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=oHr/Fdtnph+qMUUhiB4bhlTLen2qB5ktxh97Z5iiwgU61VrWi3OgTK83e7YQixl1Di5JmotLIrfC3R7SeO+x6ydLArCAA29O9jlt9+1VgaVF79asXkSqD8ytZ76SVUq6v/9iDoY164pKwwqSW1ifJAYx0Z0ELArlHBsI+YT1oi0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=BcgTMRwF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="BcgTMRwF" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 08882C433C7; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 01:25:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1709515528; bh=pbEla8fsO5S9tFM5YQ5Jg2RZxp5KAhMIEyBCKb7QDe4=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=BcgTMRwFyru1beE1rEGlZwJaFGcYHbNTONO6IkTTlZAClcIMhuLylkUcRgIbu7l5b 50JNRkZfAghoksI7SsizTo6a8UWwjjcOrGZS76DioS7PNC9LnaIgirwYkEvM+oy6sJ ZALp3Wnvz0wXZxuxqPFXi0TFx1X35rPjYfLFVh1QW7IqcZcghrfvWBIdOanGQ23oin o4nLGBOtUQQF1ITzEWUM5kuK/t32nzF3KEb5ONzFU5KlX25T0WJD/A3uY/R2upVi6i +omJnCXHPPbExL3tEVvgCFOAxIzc4fxrNzY27Rzpd1j4pXanuS7AuHYA/+LCorUokG pi6yx322q93Nw== Message-ID: <70320312-de6e-48a1-8074-c4e16e65555e@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 09:25:22 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] f2fs: fix to check return value __allocate_new_segment Content-Language: en-US To: Zhiguo Niu , jaegeuk@kernel.org Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, niuzhiguo84@gmail.com, ke.wang@unisoc.com, hongyu.jin@unisoc.com References: <1709281555-11373-1-git-send-email-zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com> From: Chao Yu In-Reply-To: <1709281555-11373-1-git-send-email-zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2024/3/1 16:25, Zhiguo Niu wrote: > __allocate_new_segment may return error when get_new_segment > fails, so its caller should check its return value. > > Signed-off-by: Zhiguo Niu Reviewed-by: Chao Yu Thanks,