From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 899DBC433F5 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 16:24:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237362AbiDFQ0z (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2022 12:26:55 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34310 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237718AbiDFQ0i (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Apr 2022 12:26:38 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.188]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35DBE3571FC for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 19:21:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dggpemm500021.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4KY7Vw221yzDqMK; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 10:19:20 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm500001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.107) by dggpemm500021.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.109) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.21; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 10:21:38 +0800 Received: from [10.174.177.243] (10.174.177.243) by dggpemm500001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.21; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 10:21:35 +0800 Message-ID: <70443d0a-51ea-6c44-5a99-784516aed68c@huawei.com> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 10:21:35 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] Revert "powerpc: Set max_mapnr correctly" Content-Language: en-US To: Michael Ellerman , Christophe Leroy , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" CC: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "npiggin@gmail.com" , "songyuanzheng@huawei.com" References: <20220216121109.157605-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> <0c6e13cc-f768-2cb4-0aa3-cd090b99fc8f@huawei.com> <877d8581y8.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> From: Kefeng Wang In-Reply-To: <877d8581y8.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.177.243] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggeme708-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.104) To dggpemm500001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.107) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2022/4/4 20:31, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Kefeng Wang writes: >> On 2022/3/28 22:12, Christophe Leroy wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Le 26/03/2022 à 08:55, Kefeng Wang a écrit : >>>> Hi maintainers， >>>> >>>> I saw the patches has been reviewed[1], could they be merged? >>> Thinking about it once more, I think the patches should go in reverse >>> order. Patch 2 should go first and patch 1 should go after. >>> >>> Otherwise, once patch 1 is applied and patch 2 is not applied yet, >>> virt_addr_valid() doesn't work anymore. >> Should I resend them or could the maintainer reverse order when merging >> them? > I'll reverse them. I've found some breakage in other code while testing > this, so I'll fix that up first before merging these. Thanks. > > In patch 2 you didn't say what hardware you hit this on, what CPU does > your system have? CPU e5500  from fsl,P5040DS. > > cheers > .