mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@intel.com>
To: Yujie Liu <yujie.liu@intel.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@intel.com>, <oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev>,
	<lkp@intel.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Guo Xuenan <guoxuenan@huawei.com>,
	<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	<feng.tang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [readahead] ab4443fe3c: vm-scalability.throughput -21.4% regression
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 13:36:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <707e218d-e9d7-4f37-b9a1-48b237e72e42@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dee823ca-7100-4289-8670-95047463c09d@intel.com>



On 3/4/24 13:35, Yin, Fengwei wrote:
> Even the file read throughput is almost same. But the distribution of
> order looks like a regression with ab4443fe3ca6 (more smaller order
> page cache is generated than parent commit). Thanks.
There may be confusion here. Let me clarify it as:
I shouldn't say folio order distribution is a regression. It's smaller
folio order cause more folios added in page cache for same workload. And
raise the lru lock contention which trigger the regression.


Regards
Yin, Fengwei

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-06  5:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-20  8:25 kernel test robot
2024-02-21 11:14 ` Jan Kara
2024-02-22  1:32   ` Oliver Sang
2024-02-22 11:50     ` Jan Kara
2024-02-22 18:37       ` Jan Kara
2024-03-04  4:59         ` Yujie Liu
2024-03-04  5:35           ` Yin, Fengwei
2024-03-06  5:36             ` Yin Fengwei [this message]
2024-03-07  9:23             ` Jan Kara
2024-03-07 18:19               ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-08  8:37                 ` Yujie Liu
2024-03-10  6:41                 ` Yin, Fengwei
2024-03-10  6:40               ` Yin, Fengwei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=707e218d-e9d7-4f37-b9a1-48b237e72e42@intel.com \
    --to=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=guoxuenan@huawei.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=yujie.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome