From: 戴志远 <daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn>
To: "Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, ardb@kernel.org,
jeyu@kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org,
vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64/kernel: improve the coding style
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 09:40:45 +0800 (GMT+08:00) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <70e779c3.3fab.1776ab2e6c9.Coremail.daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210203114158.GD55896@C02TD0UTHF1T.local>
I am very sorry, my English cooperation is poor, just want to contribute。
2021-02-03 19:41:58 "Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com> 写道:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 01:48:19PM +0800, Zhiyuan Dai wrote:
> > Just improve the coding style.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhiyuan Dai <daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn>
>
> This is terse and doesn't tell the reader what to expect. It would be
> better to say something more specific, e.g.
>
> | arm64: improve whitespace
> |
> | In a few places we don't have whitespace between macro parameters,
> | which makes them hard to read. This patch adds whitespace to clearly
> | separate the parameters.
> |
> | In a few places we have unnecessary whitespace around unary operators,
> | which is confusing, This patch removes the unnecessary whitespace.
>
> ... which more clearly justifies the change.
>
> The patch itself looks sane to me (and the unary operator cleanup is
> certianly nice), so with that wording:
>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c | 2 +-
> > arch/arm64/kernel/module-plts.c | 2 +-
> > arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 2 +-
> > arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 4 ++--
> > 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c
> > index a57cffb..1184c44 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/alternative.c
> > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
> > #include <asm/sections.h>
> > #include <linux/stop_machine.h>
> >
> > -#define __ALT_PTR(a,f) ((void *)&(a)->f + (a)->f)
> > +#define __ALT_PTR(a, f) ((void *)&(a)->f + (a)->f)
> > #define ALT_ORIG_PTR(a) __ALT_PTR(a, orig_offset)
> > #define ALT_REPL_PTR(a) __ALT_PTR(a, alt_offset)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/module-plts.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/module-plts.c
> > index 2e22443..e53493d 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/module-plts.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/module-plts.c
> > @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ u64 module_emit_veneer_for_adrp(struct module *mod, Elf64_Shdr *sechdrs,
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> > -#define cmp_3way(a,b) ((a) < (b) ? -1 : (a) > (b))
> > +#define cmp_3way(a, b) ((a) < (b) ? -1 : (a) > (b))
> >
> > static int cmp_rela(const void *a, const void *b)
> > {
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> > index 3605f77a..d1fec4a 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> > @@ -810,7 +810,7 @@ static int armv8pmu_get_single_idx(struct pmu_hw_events *cpuc,
> > {
> > int idx;
> >
> > - for (idx = ARMV8_IDX_COUNTER0; idx < cpu_pmu->num_events; idx ++) {
> > + for (idx = ARMV8_IDX_COUNTER0; idx < cpu_pmu->num_events; idx++) {
> > if (!test_and_set_bit(idx, cpuc->used_mask))
> > return idx;
> > }
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> > index 6616486..4cc1ccc 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
> > @@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ void __show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > -void show_regs(struct pt_regs * regs)
> > +void show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > {
> > __show_regs(regs);
> > dump_backtrace(regs, NULL, KERN_DEFAULT);
> > @@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ unsigned long get_wchan(struct task_struct *p)
> > ret = frame.pc;
> > goto out;
> > }
> > - } while (count ++ < 16);
> > + } while (count++ < 16);
> >
> > out:
> > put_task_stack(p);
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-04 1:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-03 5:48 Zhiyuan Dai
2021-02-03 11:41 ` Mark Rutland
2021-02-04 1:40 ` 戴志远 [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=70e779c3.3fab.1776ab2e6c9.Coremail.daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn \
--to=daizhiyuan@phytium.com.cn \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®