From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1031919Ab2COQul (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:50:41 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f52.google.com ([209.85.210.52]:50333 "EHLO mail-pz0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031783Ab2COQuj (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:50:39 -0400 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Nicolas Ferre Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ludovic.desroches@atmel.com, mpm@selenic.com, herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au, vinod.koul@intel.com, a.zummo@towertech.it Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] AT91 drivers Kconfig cleanup Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 09:50:31 -0700 Message-ID: <7104123.IANagkT9hm@dtor-d630.eng.vmware.com> User-Agent: KMail/4.7.4 (Linux/3.2.9-1.fc16.x86_64; KDE/4.7.4; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, March 15, 2012 04:57:16 PM Nicolas Ferre wrote: > This is a series which deals with AT91 drivers Kconfig entries. Its goal is > to remove too restrictive dependencies on SoC names. > This will allow to add support for newer SoC seamlessly. > > One question remains: should I submit those patches through dedicated > sub-maintainer's git trees or can I queue the whole series in arm-soc? I'm fine if you queue input piece through arm-soc. Thanks. -- Dmitry