From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@arm.com>
Subject: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Use policy-dependent transition delays
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:20:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <71055380.gdY33coAtF@aspire.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2407280.n9qVSLCrF5@aspire.rjw.lan>
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Make the schedutil governor take the initial (default) value of the
rate_limit_us sysfs attribute from the (new) transition_delay_us
policy parameter (to be set by the scaling driver).
That will allow scaling drivers to make schedutil use smaller default
values of rate_limit_us and reduce the default average time interval
between consecutive frequency changes.
Make intel_pstate set transition_delay_us to 500.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
This is a replacement for https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9671831/
---
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 2 ++
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 7 +++++++
kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/include/linux/cpufreq.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ linux-pm/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -120,6 +120,13 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {
bool fast_switch_possible;
bool fast_switch_enabled;
+ /*
+ * Preferred average time interval between consecutive invocations of
+ * the driver to set the frequency for this policy. To be set by the
+ * scaling driver (0, which is the default, means no preference).
+ */
+ unsigned int transition_delay_us;
+
/* Cached frequency lookup from cpufreq_driver_resolve_freq. */
unsigned int cached_target_freq;
int cached_resolved_idx;
Index: linux-pm/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ linux-pm/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -491,7 +491,6 @@ static int sugov_init(struct cpufreq_pol
{
struct sugov_policy *sg_policy;
struct sugov_tunables *tunables;
- unsigned int lat;
int ret = 0;
/* State should be equivalent to EXIT */
@@ -530,10 +529,16 @@ static int sugov_init(struct cpufreq_pol
goto stop_kthread;
}
- tunables->rate_limit_us = LATENCY_MULTIPLIER;
- lat = policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency / NSEC_PER_USEC;
- if (lat)
- tunables->rate_limit_us *= lat;
+ if (policy->transition_delay_us) {
+ tunables->rate_limit_us = policy->transition_delay_us;
+ } else {
+ unsigned int lat;
+
+ tunables->rate_limit_us = LATENCY_MULTIPLIER;
+ lat = policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency / NSEC_PER_USEC;
+ if (lat)
+ tunables->rate_limit_us *= lat;
+ }
policy->governor_data = sg_policy;
sg_policy->tunables = tunables;
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
#define INTEL_PSTATE_HWP_SAMPLING_INTERVAL (50 * NSEC_PER_MSEC)
#define INTEL_CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_LATENCY 20000
+#define INTEL_CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_DELAY 500
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
#include <acpi/processor.h>
@@ -2237,6 +2238,7 @@ static int intel_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct
return ret;
policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = INTEL_CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_LATENCY;
+ policy->transition_delay_us = INTEL_CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_DELAY;
/* This reflects the intel_pstate_get_cpu_pstates() setting. */
policy->cur = policy->cpuinfo.min_freq;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-10 22:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-10 0:07 [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Updates related to the rate limit Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-04-10 0:10 ` [RFC/RFT][PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Use policy-dependent latency multupliers Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-04-10 10:38 ` Brendan Jackman
2017-04-10 11:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-04-10 22:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2017-04-11 11:14 ` [RFC/RFT][PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Use policy-dependent transition delays Viresh Kumar
2017-04-11 14:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-04-14 22:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-04-15 2:23 ` Joel Fernandes
2017-04-18 9:43 ` Brendan Jackman
2017-04-17 5:41 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-04-10 0:11 ` [RFC/RFT][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Utilization aggregation Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-04-10 6:39 ` Joel Fernandes
2017-04-10 20:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-04-11 1:57 ` Joel Fernandes
2017-04-11 20:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-04-10 11:26 ` Juri Lelli
2017-04-10 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-04-11 7:00 ` Juri Lelli
2017-04-11 21:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=71055380.gdY33coAtF@aspire.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=brendan.jackman@arm.com \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®