mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shea Levy <shea@shealevy.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Revisiting EFI boot stub config file support
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 08:26:29 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <710F73BE-9F65-48C9-8739-BFCF097F4B07@shealevy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50E31BB4.7040702@zytor.com>

On Jan 1, 2013, at 12:24, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:

> On 01/01/2013 07:55 AM, Shea Levy wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> In March last year, I submitted a patch to enable the EFI boot stub to
>> read its config arguments from a file on the ESP, both to help with
>> booting from livecds and to avoid having to use efibootmgr every time
>> you change your boottime arguments. I ended up dropping the submission
>> because I ended up coming to the conclusion that tools like rEFInd and
>> gummiboot were better suited to the task of boot managing than the
>> kernel itself.
>> 
>> Since then, however, I've received enough emails asking about the status
>> of the patch that I think there is room for a simpler entrant into the
>> field of linux EFI boot management. This could be in-kernel, as per my
>> original patch, or a very simple out-of-kernel (but maybe distributed
>> in-tree?) efi image that simply reads linux.conf and boots linux with
>> those parameters. My personal bias is still toward handling this
>> functionality outside of the kernel itself, but before I started the
>> work I thought I'd ask here if anyone thought I should instead bring my
>> old patch up-to-date.
> 
> I am willing to accept this (but I am not the first-line maintainer,
> Matt is) in the kernel EFI stub as long as there are no hard-coded
> filenames involved, no automatic behavior, and no "scanning".  Those are
> showstoppers, as is adding to the boot time for nonusers.

Hm, ok. Does the boot stub have access to CONFIG_CMDLINE? Or could another compile-time setting be added so that distros can ship livecds that automatically use a config file found at a hard-coded location?

> 
>    -hpa
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-02 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-01 15:55 Shea Levy
2013-01-01 17:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-01-02 13:26   ` Shea Levy [this message]
2013-01-02 17:43     ` Matthew Garrett
2013-01-02 17:52       ` Shea Levy
2013-01-02 17:54         ` Matthew Garrett
2013-01-02 17:52       ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=710F73BE-9F65-48C9-8739-BFCF097F4B07@shealevy.com \
    --to=shea@shealevy.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®