From: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Daniel Kiss <daniel.kiss@arm.com>,
Denis Nikitin <denik@google.com>,
coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] coresight: etm-perf: Correct buffer syncing for snapshot
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 17:54:20 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <71158b94-863d-97d3-323a-e2406b708db7@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210601103504.GC10026@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
On 01/06/2021 13:35, Leo Yan wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 12:53:16PM +0300, James Clark wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Hi Leo,
>>
>> I was testing out snapshot mode (without your patch) and I noticed that it
>> only ever collects from the last CPU. For example on a 4 core system,
>> the CPU ID of the AUX records and the AUXTRACE buffers is always 3.
>>
>> This is with systemwide tracing, and running "stress -m 2 -c 2".
>> Is this something that your patch fixes, or am I doing something wrong, or
>> is it just a coincidence?
>
> No, I think it's quite likely caused by blow code:
>
> static unsigned long
> tmc_update_etr_buffer(struct coresight_device *csdev,
> struct perf_output_handle *handle,
> void *config)
> {
> unsigned long flags, offset, size = 0;
>
> ...
>
> /* Don't do anything if another tracer is using this sink */
> if (atomic_read(csdev->refcnt) != 1) {
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
> goto out;
> }
>
> ...
>
> return size;
> }
>
> When using the system wide tracing, it updates the AUX ring buffer
> until the last tracer is stopped. Thus whis is why it only records
> AUX ring buffer for the last CPU.
>
> But this makes sense for me, this is because the last CPU is used to
> copy trace data to AUX ring buffer (so the perf event PERF_RECORD_AUX
> occurs on CPU3), but when you decode the trace data, you should can
> see the activities from other CPUs.
>
> Thanks,
> Leo
>
I have one more issue around snapshot mode which I'd like to check if it's
related to this patchset.
In "[PATCH v5 0/1] perf cs-etm: Split Coresight decode by aux records",
I added the warning for a missing AUXTRACE buffer as you suggested.
Now this warning gets triggered on the last AUX record when using
snapshot mode. I don't know if you are able to reproduce this.
Thanks
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-10 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-28 16:15 [PATCH v1 0/3] coresight: Fix for snapshot mode Leo Yan
2021-05-28 16:15 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] coresight: etm-perf: Correct buffer syncing for snapshot Leo Yan
2021-06-01 9:53 ` James Clark
2021-06-01 10:35 ` Leo Yan
2021-06-10 14:54 ` James Clark [this message]
2021-06-11 13:55 ` James Clark
2021-06-08 21:41 ` Mathieu Poirier
2021-06-09 1:35 ` Leo Yan
2021-06-09 1:39 ` Leo Yan
2021-05-28 16:15 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] coresight: tmc-etr: Use perf_output_handle::head for AUX ring buffer Leo Yan
2021-06-10 15:38 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2021-05-28 16:15 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] perf cs-etm: Remove callback cs_etm_find_snapshot() Leo Yan
2021-06-22 14:29 ` James Clark
2021-06-28 1:31 ` Leo Yan
2021-06-24 16:46 ` James Clark
2021-06-10 6:43 ` [PATCH v1 0/3] coresight: Fix for snapshot mode Denis Nikitin
2021-06-10 16:04 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2021-06-11 8:31 ` Denis Nikitin
2021-06-12 3:27 ` Leo Yan
2021-06-21 8:21 ` Denis Nikitin
2021-06-22 12:58 ` Leo Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=71158b94-863d-97d3-323a-e2406b708db7@arm.com \
--to=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=daniel.kiss@arm.com \
--cc=denik@google.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®