From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753516AbeAFBmt (ORCPT + 1 other); Fri, 5 Jan 2018 20:42:49 -0500 Received: from vern.gendns.com ([206.190.152.46]:56754 "EHLO vern.gendns.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752226AbeAFBms (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jan 2018 20:42:48 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] ARM: davinci: convert to common clock framework To: Sekhar Nori , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Kevin Hilman , Adam Ford , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1514763588-31560-1-git-send-email-david@lechnology.com> <1514763588-31560-7-git-send-email-david@lechnology.com> <8fcd9bf8-249b-7e0b-0e37-70f011ab1b7e@ti.com> From: David Lechner Message-ID: <7143f0fb-9bb2-dc66-56d4-aefa66f852a1@lechnology.com> Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 19:42:46 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8fcd9bf8-249b-7e0b-0e37-70f011ab1b7e@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - vern.gendns.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - lechnology.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: vern.gendns.com: authenticated_id: davidmain+lechnology.com/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed X-Authenticated-Sender: vern.gendns.com: davidmain@lechnology.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: On 01/05/2018 04:42 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: > On Friday 05 January 2018 08:29 AM, David Lechner wrote: >> On 01/04/2018 11:50 AM, David Lechner wrote: >>> On 1/4/18 6:39 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: > >>>> This is a pretty huge patch again and I hope it can be broken down. >>>> Ideally one per SoC converted and then the unused code removal. >>>> >>> >>> Will do. >> >> Well, I can do this, but I don't think it will compile or run. We can't >> have the common clock framework and the legacy davinci clocks enabled at >> the same time. > > I see. Can you at least hive off the code removal into a separate patch > for next submission. I will then take a closer look at this. > I've realized that I can accomplish this if I use some #if 0/#endif blocks temporarily if that sounds OK.