From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: peng.hao2@zte.com.cn, richard.weiyang@gmail.com
Cc: penghao122@sina.com.cn, pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, joro@8bytes.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm/x86 : avoid shifting signed 32-bit value by 31 bits
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 10:16:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <717c02f3-bb36-33c4-a463-f5759fde30fd@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201810080904344038939@zte.com.cn>
On 10/7/18 6:04 PM, peng.hao2@zte.com.cn wrote:
\>>>>>
>>>>> #define AVIC_LOGICAL_ID_ENTRY_GUEST_PHYSICAL_ID_MASK (0xFF)
>>>>> -#define AVIC_LOGICAL_ID_ENTRY_VALID_MASK (1 << 31)
>>>>> +#define AVIC_LOGICAL_ID_ENTRY_VALID_MASK (1UL << 31)
>>>
>>>> It is reasonable to change to unsigned, while not necessary to unsigned
>>>> long?
>>> AVIC_LOGICAL_ID_ENTRY_VALID_MASK is used in function avic_ldr_write.
>>> here I think it doesn't matter if you use unsigned or unsigned long. Do you have any suggestions?
>
>> In current case, AVIC_LOGICAL_ID_ENTRY_VALID_MASK is used to calculate
>> the value of new_entry with type of u32. So the definition here is not
>> harmful.
>
>> Also, I did a quick grep and found similar definition (1 << 31) is popular
>> in the whole kernel tree.
>
>> The reason to make this change is not that strong to me. Would you
>> minding sharing more reason behind this change?
> oh, I'm just thinking logically, not more reason.
The right way to do this would be to use the _BITUL() (or _BITULL()) macro.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-15 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-04 17:47 Peng Hao
2018-10-06 2:11 ` Wei Yang
[not found] ` <201810061131044868733@zte.com.cn>
2018-10-06 7:08 ` Wei Yang
[not found] ` <201810080904344038939@zte.com.cn>
2018-10-08 2:25 ` Wei Yang
2018-10-15 17:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-10-15 17:16 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2018-10-15 17:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-10-15 17:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=717c02f3-bb36-33c4-a463-f5759fde30fd@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peng.hao2@zte.com.cn \
--cc=penghao122@sina.com.cn \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®