From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752483Ab3FXKtm (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jun 2013 06:49:42 -0400 Received: from hydra.sisk.pl ([212.160.235.94]:48928 "EHLO hydra.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751621Ab3FXKtl (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jun 2013 06:49:41 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Viresh Kumar Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Lists linaro-kernel Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: CPUFreq updates for 3.11 Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 12:59:07 +0200 Message-ID: <7195611.gCcafMWC85@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.9.5 (Linux/3.10.0-rc5+; KDE/4.9.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1524748.bV9OZAOR0D@vostro.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, June 24, 2013 04:12:29 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 24 June 2013 16:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, June 24, 2013 11:20:35 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > >> Hi Rafael, > >> > >> This is part of my patchset "CPUFreq: Fix {PRE|POST}CHANGE notification > >> sequence". It contains changes specific to cpufreq core and ARM drivers. > >> > >> I have left changes to non-ARM cpufreq drivers from this pull request. See if > >> you can take them for 3.11. > >> > >> The following changes since commit 9e895ace5d82df8929b16f58e9f515f6d54ab82d: > >> > >> Linux 3.10-rc7 (2013-06-22 09:47:31 -1000) > >> > >> are available in the git repository at: > >> > >> git://git.linaro.org/people/vireshk/linux.git cpufreq-fix-notification-arm > >> > >> for you to fetch changes up to f2d65dd0d573e6961165f0be35bac84997b9e707: > > > > Well, this contains changes that aren't specific to ARM as far as I can say. > > Yeah, the first patch touches core. How do you want to proceed with this one > then? You will apply them from mail? Or you will apply first patch (core cpufreq > one) and I should send pull request without it? In your original series that patch was the last one. What made you change your mind and put it in front? Rafael