mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	Jan Dabros <jsd@semihalf.com>, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: designware: Avoid taking clk_prepare mutex in PM callbacks
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 15:45:43 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7198221a-1f12-49cf-9d35-7498ae7389cd@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aKX4xEYE29JC_g14@xhacker>

On 8/20/25 7:33 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 07:05:42PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 11:31:24PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
>>> This is unsafe, as the runtime PM callbacks are called from the PM
>>> workqueue, so this may deadlock when handling an i2c attached clock,
>>> which may already hold the clk_prepare mutex from another context.
>>
>> Can you be more specific? What is the actual issue in practice?
>> Do you have traces and lockdep warnings?
> 
> Assume we use i2c designware to control any i2c based clks, e.g the
> clk-si5351.c driver. In its .clk_prepare, we'll get the prepare_lock
> mutex, then we call i2c adapter to operate the regs, to runtime resume
> the i2c adapter, we call clk_prepare_enable() which will try to get
> the prepare_lock mutex again.
> 
I'd also like to see the issue here. I'm blind to see what's the 
relation between the clocks managed by the clk-si5351.c and clocks to 
the i2c-designware IP.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-21 12:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-20 15:31 [PATCH 0/2] i2c: designware: Implement atomic transfer suppot Jisheng Zhang
2025-08-20 15:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] i2c: designware: Avoid taking clk_prepare mutex in PM callbacks Jisheng Zhang
2025-08-20 16:05   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-08-20 16:33     ` Jisheng Zhang
2025-08-21 12:45       ` Jarkko Nikula [this message]
2025-08-21 13:01         ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-08-21 16:32           ` Jisheng Zhang
2025-08-22  9:18             ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-08-22  9:34               ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-08-22 13:56                 ` Jisheng Zhang
2025-08-22 23:51                 ` Jisheng Zhang
2025-08-20 15:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] i2c: designware: Implement atomic transfer suppot Jisheng Zhang
2025-08-20 17:00   ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7198221a-1f12-49cf-9d35-7498ae7389cd@linux.intel.com \
    --to=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jsd@semihalf.com \
    --cc=jszhang@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®