From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Jan Dabros <jsd@semihalf.com>, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: designware: Avoid taking clk_prepare mutex in PM callbacks
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 15:45:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7198221a-1f12-49cf-9d35-7498ae7389cd@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aKX4xEYE29JC_g14@xhacker>
On 8/20/25 7:33 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 07:05:42PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 11:31:24PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
>>> This is unsafe, as the runtime PM callbacks are called from the PM
>>> workqueue, so this may deadlock when handling an i2c attached clock,
>>> which may already hold the clk_prepare mutex from another context.
>>
>> Can you be more specific? What is the actual issue in practice?
>> Do you have traces and lockdep warnings?
>
> Assume we use i2c designware to control any i2c based clks, e.g the
> clk-si5351.c driver. In its .clk_prepare, we'll get the prepare_lock
> mutex, then we call i2c adapter to operate the regs, to runtime resume
> the i2c adapter, we call clk_prepare_enable() which will try to get
> the prepare_lock mutex again.
>
I'd also like to see the issue here. I'm blind to see what's the
relation between the clocks managed by the clk-si5351.c and clocks to
the i2c-designware IP.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-21 12:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-20 15:31 [PATCH 0/2] i2c: designware: Implement atomic transfer suppot Jisheng Zhang
2025-08-20 15:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] i2c: designware: Avoid taking clk_prepare mutex in PM callbacks Jisheng Zhang
2025-08-20 16:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-08-20 16:33 ` Jisheng Zhang
2025-08-21 12:45 ` Jarkko Nikula [this message]
2025-08-21 13:01 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-08-21 16:32 ` Jisheng Zhang
2025-08-22 9:18 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-08-22 9:34 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-08-22 13:56 ` Jisheng Zhang
2025-08-22 23:51 ` Jisheng Zhang
2025-08-20 15:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] i2c: designware: Implement atomic transfer suppot Jisheng Zhang
2025-08-20 17:00 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7198221a-1f12-49cf-9d35-7498ae7389cd@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jsd@semihalf.com \
--cc=jszhang@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®