Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/12] rv: Add monitors to validate task switch

[Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>]

On Wed, 2025-05-21 at 09:15 +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 10:43:02AM +0200, Gabriele Monaco wrote:
> > I'm keeping this as RFC as I'm planning to make it ready after
> > merging
> > the LTL series [1]
> > 
> > This series adds three monitors to the sched collection, extends
> > and
> > replaces previously existing monitors:
> 
> What is your base? I cannot apply the series (maybe because I'm
> illiterate
> on git...)
> 
> $ b4 am 20250514084314.57976-1-gmonaco@redhat.com
> ...
> $ git am -3
> ./v2_20250514_gmonaco_rv_add_monitors_to_validate_task_switch.mbx
> Applying: tools/rv: Do not skip idle in trace
> Applying: tools/rv: Stop gracefully also on SIGTERM
> Applying: rv: Add da_handle_start_run_event_ to per-task monitors
> Applying: rv: Remove trailing whitespace from tracepoint string
> Applying: rv: Return init error when registering monitors
> Applying: sched: Adapt sched tracepoints for RV task model
> error: sha1 information is lacking or useless
> (include/linux/sched.h).
> error: could not build fake ancestor
> Patch failed at 0006 sched: Adapt sched tracepoints for RV task model
> hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
> hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
> hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
> hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am -
> -abort".
> hint: Disable this message with "git config set advice.mergeConflict
> false"

Mmh, it /was/ linux-next, I'm not sure if that gets rebased and breaks
stuff, but it shouldn't.

I think it should apply cleanly on any up-to-date tree provided you
also apply
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/174413914101.31282.6876925851363406689.tip-bot2@tip-bot2
(which is on next, so it's not required if that's your tree).

If that doesn't help, my base was
aa94665adc28f3fdc3de2979ac1e98bae961d6ca (tag: next-20250513), I
included it in 00/12 but I'm not sure what kind of tool reads that.
I guess next time I should add Peter's patch to the series too to save
people some headache though..