From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751562AbeCQEDL (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Mar 2018 00:03:11 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:33494 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750746AbeCQEDI (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Mar 2018 00:03:08 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 2FA136030F Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=okaya@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 18/18] infiniband: cxgb4: Eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs To: Steve Wise , netdev@vger.kernel.org, timur@codeaurora.org, sulrich@codeaurora.org Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "'Steve Wise'" , "'Doug Ledford'" , "'Jason Gunthorpe'" , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "'Michael Werner'" , "'Casey Leedom'" References: <1521216991-28706-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <1521216991-28706-19-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <003601d3bd6a$783d6970$68b83c50$@opengridcomputing.com> <83387f6e-adcb-14e9-2c22-96abf9493cc6@codeaurora.org> <004501d3bd7b$505e70f0$f11b52d0$@opengridcomputing.com> <740c7d45-450e-c9b3-ceed-7bc7fcefbc5a@codeaurora.org> From: Sinan Kaya Message-ID: <71e37a55-537b-d75a-cfde-f188b7cfce8e@codeaurora.org> Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 00:03:05 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <740c7d45-450e-c9b3-ceed-7bc7fcefbc5a@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 3/16/2018 11:40 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote: > I'll change writel_relaxed() with __raw_writel() in the series like you suggested > and also look at your other comments. I spoke too soon. Now that I realized, code needs to follow one of the following patterns for correctness 1) wmb() writel()/writel_relaxed() or 2) wmb() __raw_wrltel() mmiowb() but definitely not wmb() __raw_wrltel() Since #1 == #2, I'll stick to my current implementation of writel_relaxed() Changing writel() to writel_relaxed() or __raw_writel() isn't enough. PowerPC needs mmiowb() for correctness. ARM's mmiowb() implementation is empty. So, there is no one size fits all solution with the current state of affairs. -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.