mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ashwin-h <ashwinh@vmware.com>
To: <tytso@mit.edu>, <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>
Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<stable@kernel.org>, <srivatsab@vmware.com>,
	<srivatsa@csail.mit.edu>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	<srostedt@vmware.com>, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	<ashwin.hiranniah@gmail.com>, Ashwin H <ashwinh@vmware.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 00:51:36 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <722d8a1048d1ecca88922c2248cbc1af9971d83d.1587713792.git.ashwinh@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1587713792.git.ashwinh@vmware.com>

From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

commit 345c0dbf3a30872d9b204db96b5857cd00808cae upstream.

Add the blocks which belong to the journal inode to block_validity's
system zone so attempts to deallocate or overwrite the journal due a
corrupted file system where the journal blocks are also claimed by
another inode.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202879
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Ashwin H <ashwinh@vmware.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
---
 fs/ext4/block_validity.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 fs/ext4/inode.c          |  4 ++++
 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
index fdb1954..bdc8e48 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
@@ -136,6 +136,48 @@ static void debug_print_tree(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi)
 	printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
 }
 
+static int ext4_protect_reserved_inode(struct super_block *sb, u32 ino)
+{
+	struct inode *inode;
+	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
+	struct ext4_map_blocks map;
+	u32 i = 0, err = 0, num, n;
+
+	if ((ino < EXT4_ROOT_INO) ||
+	    (ino > le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_inodes_count)))
+		return -EINVAL;
+	inode = ext4_iget(sb, ino, EXT4_IGET_SPECIAL);
+	if (IS_ERR(inode))
+		return PTR_ERR(inode);
+	num = (inode->i_size + sb->s_blocksize - 1) >> sb->s_blocksize_bits;
+	while (i < num) {
+		map.m_lblk = i;
+		map.m_len = num - i;
+		n = ext4_map_blocks(NULL, inode, &map, 0);
+		if (n < 0) {
+			err = n;
+			break;
+		}
+		if (n == 0) {
+			i++;
+		} else {
+			if (!ext4_data_block_valid(sbi, map.m_pblk, n)) {
+				ext4_error(sb, "blocks %llu-%llu from inode %u "
+					   "overlap system zone", map.m_pblk,
+					   map.m_pblk + map.m_len - 1, ino);
+				err = -EFSCORRUPTED;
+				break;
+			}
+			err = add_system_zone(sbi, map.m_pblk, n);
+			if (err < 0)
+				break;
+			i += n;
+		}
+	}
+	iput(inode);
+	return err;
+}
+
 int ext4_setup_system_zone(struct super_block *sb)
 {
 	ext4_group_t ngroups = ext4_get_groups_count(sb);
@@ -170,6 +212,12 @@ int ext4_setup_system_zone(struct super_block *sb)
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 	}
+	if (ext4_has_feature_journal(sb) && sbi->s_es->s_journal_inum) {
+		ret = ext4_protect_reserved_inode(sb,
+				le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_journal_inum));
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
 
 	if (test_opt(sb, DEBUG))
 		debug_print_tree(EXT4_SB(sb));
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 3a9fd5f..dc08c2b 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -374,6 +374,10 @@ static int __check_block_validity(struct inode *inode, const char *func,
 				unsigned int line,
 				struct ext4_map_blocks *map)
 {
+	if (ext4_has_feature_journal(inode->i_sb) &&
+	    (inode->i_ino ==
+	     le32_to_cpu(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_es->s_journal_inum)))
+		return 0;
 	if (!ext4_data_block_valid(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb), map->m_pblk,
 				   map->m_len)) {
 		ext4_error_inode(inode, func, line, map->m_pblk,
-- 
2.7.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-29 11:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-29 19:21 [PATCH 0/5] Backport to 4.9- " ashwin-h
2020-04-29 12:59 ` Greg KH
2020-04-29 20:39   ` Ashwin H
2020-05-01 12:10     ` Greg KH
2020-04-29 19:21 ` [PATCH 1/5] ext4: avoid declaring fs inconsistent due to invalid file handles ashwin-h
2020-04-29 19:21 ` ashwin-h [this message]
2020-04-29 19:21 ` [PATCH 3/5] ext4: don't perform block validity checks on the journal inode ashwin-h
2020-04-29 19:21 ` [PATCH 4/5] ext4: fix block validity checks for journal inodes using indirect blocks ashwin-h
2020-04-29 19:21 ` [PATCH 5/5] ext4: unsigned int compared against zero ashwin-h
2020-04-30  4:22 [PATCH 0/5] Backport to 4.14 - ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity ashwin-h
2020-04-30  4:22 ` [PATCH 2/5] " ashwin-h
2020-04-30  4:35 [PATCH 0/5] Backport to 4.4 - " ashwin-h
2020-04-30  4:35 ` [PATCH 2/5] " ashwin-h

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=722d8a1048d1ecca88922c2248cbc1af9971d83d.1587713792.git.ashwinh@vmware.com \
    --to=ashwinh@vmware.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=ashwin.hiranniah@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=srivatsa@csail.mit.edu \
    --cc=srivatsab@vmware.com \
    --cc=srostedt@vmware.com \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®