From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422808Ab3CWAz7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Mar 2013 20:55:59 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:51095 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422667Ab3CWAz6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Mar 2013 20:55:58 -0400 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <1363998796.8972.69.camel@schen9-DESK> References: <1363987742.8972.55.camel@schen9-DESK> <09e94963-5146-4c1b-ab76-64ac73d660ab@email.android.com> <1363998796.8972.69.camel@schen9-DESK> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] Added macro to check for AVX2 feature. From: "H. Peter Anvin" Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:55:38 -0700 To: Tim Chen CC: Herbert Xu , "David S.Miller" , Kirk Yap , David Cote , James Guilford , Wajdi Feghali , linux-kernel , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <7243684e-3017-4519-8758-651618da609f@email.android.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Just syntactic overhead. We should probably discuss it among ourselves first though. Tim Chen wrote: >On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 17:21 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> I really, really hate these macros... Not sure they are worth the >extra noise. >> > >I can do without the macro and I'll remove it. > >Wonder the reason that such macro should be avoided? > >Tim -- Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.