From: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
To: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>,
"Broadcom internal kernel review list"
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@kernel.org>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Felix Fietkau" <nbd@openwrt.org>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: bgmac: fix oversized RX frame check
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 10:00:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <725c51ed-6e7f-44cf-b5e1-73fc39623fc3@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261028011035.49201-1-rosenp@gmail.com>
On 10/27/26 18:10, Rosen Penev wrote:
> While reviewing commit 77dac783f11
> ("net: bgmac: rate limit RX error messages") , Florian spotted that the RX
> length sanity check compares the length reported in the RX header against
> BGMAC_RX_ALLOC_SIZE. That is the size of the whole fragment, including the
> space reserved for struct skb_shared_info. The data area handed to the
> hardware is only BGMAC_RX_BUF_SIZE bytes, and the frame starts
> BGMAC_RX_FRAME_OFFSET bytes into it, so a valid frame is at most
> BGMAC_RX_MAX_FRAME_SIZE bytes long.
>
> A corrupted length between those two limits passes the check, and the
> following skb_put() runs past the skb tailroom and calls
> skb_over_panic() instead of dropping the frame.
>
> Compare against BGMAC_RX_MAX_FRAME_SIZE instead.
>
> Only compile tested. Not tested on hardware.
>
> Fixes: 6a6c708469c9 ("bgmac: add check for oversized packets")
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-28 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-28 1:10 Rosen Penev
2026-10-28 2:22 ` Chenguang Zhao
2026-10-28 2:23 ` Rosen Penev
2026-10-28 17:00 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=725c51ed-6e7f-44cf-b5e1-73fc39623fc3@broadcom.com \
--to=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
--cc=rosenp@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®