Re: [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: Remove mct interrupt index enum

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>]

On 19/02/2022 19:10, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> MCT driver define an enum which list global and local timer's
> irq index. Most of them are not used but MCT_G0_IRQ and
> MCT_L0_IRQ and these two are at a fixed offset/index.
> Get rid of this enum and use a #define for the used irq index.
> 
> While at it, bump-up maximum number of MCT IRQ to match the
> binding documentation. And also change the name variable to be
> more generic.
> 
> No functional changes expected.

There is a functional change - you increase MCT_NR_IRQS from 12 to 20
which affects size of mct_irqs. Can you increase it in separate commit?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c | 25 ++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> - currently tested on exynos7 platform, appreciate testing on
>  exynos-{3,4,5} platforms
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
> index 6db3d5511b0f..4aea9cd3f7ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/exynos_mct.c
> @@ -60,27 +60,18 @@
>  #define MCT_CLKEVENTS_RATING		350
>  #endif
>  
> +/* There are four Global timers starting with 0 offset */
> +#define MCT_G0_IRQ	0
> +/* Local timers count starts after global timer count */
> +#define MCT_L0_IRQ	4
> +/* Max number of MCT IRQ as per binding document */
> +#define MCT_NR_IRQS	20
> +
>  enum {
>  	MCT_INT_SPI,
>  	MCT_INT_PPI
>  };
>  
> -enum {
> -	MCT_G0_IRQ,
> -	MCT_G1_IRQ,
> -	MCT_G2_IRQ,
> -	MCT_G3_IRQ,
> -	MCT_L0_IRQ,
> -	MCT_L1_IRQ,
> -	MCT_L2_IRQ,
> -	MCT_L3_IRQ,
> -	MCT_L4_IRQ,
> -	MCT_L5_IRQ,
> -	MCT_L6_IRQ,
> -	MCT_L7_IRQ,
> -	MCT_NR_IRQS,
> -};
> -
>  static void __iomem *reg_base;
>  static unsigned long clk_rate;
>  static unsigned int mct_int_type;
> @@ -89,7 +80,7 @@ static int mct_irqs[MCT_NR_IRQS];
>  struct mct_clock_event_device {
>  	struct clock_event_device evt;
>  	unsigned long base;
> -	char name[10];
> +	char name[MCT_NR_IRQS - 1];

This does not look related MCT_NR_IRQS and using here MCT_NR_IRQS
confuses. This is a "mct_tick%d" with number of local timers, so maybe
make it just 11?

>  };
>  
>  static void exynos4_mct_write(unsigned int value, unsigned long offset)


Best regards,
Krzysztof