From: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
To: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Collabora Kernel ML <kernel@collabora.com>,
fparent@baylibre.com, drinkcat@chromium.org, hsinyi@chromium.org,
weiyi.lu@mediatek.com, Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Add SMI block as bus protection block
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 16:18:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <728d3c36-0f89-c3f9-e9f8-88a3a671cd02@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ee2b40c3-b565-22ed-34f4-4259d546a623@gmail.com>
Hi Matthias,
Thank you for your review.
On 2/10/20 10:56, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
>
> On 01/10/2020 18:01, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
>> From: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com>
>>
>> Apart from the infracfg block, the SMI block is used to enable the bus
>> protection for some power domains. Add support for this block.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@suse.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v2: None
>>
>> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
>> include/linux/soc/mediatek/infracfg.h | 6 +++
>> 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
>> b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
>> index b5e7c9846c34..38f2630bdd0a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
>> @@ -56,8 +56,25 @@
>> #define SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA 3
>> +#define _BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, _update) { \
>> + .bus_prot_mask = (_mask), \
>> + .bus_prot_set = _set, \
>> + .bus_prot_clr = _clr, \
>> + .bus_prot_sta = _sta, \
>> + .bus_prot_reg_update = _update, \
>> + }
>> +
>> +#define BUS_PROT_WR(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta) \
>> + _BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, false)
>> +
>> +#define BUS_PROT_UPDATE(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta) \
>> + _BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta, true)
>> +
>> struct scpsys_bus_prot_data {
>> u32 bus_prot_mask;
>> + u32 bus_prot_set;
>> + u32 bus_prot_clr;
>> + u32 bus_prot_sta;
>> bool bus_prot_reg_update;
>> };
>> @@ -69,6 +86,7 @@ struct scpsys_bus_prot_data {
>> * @sram_pdn_ack_bits: The mask for sram power control acked bits.
>> * @caps: The flag for active wake-up action.
>> * @bp_infracfg: bus protection for infracfg subsystem
>> + * @bp_smi: bus protection for smi subsystem
>> */
>> struct scpsys_domain_data {
>> u32 sta_mask;
>> @@ -77,6 +95,7 @@ struct scpsys_domain_data {
>> u32 sram_pdn_ack_bits;
>> u8 caps;
>> const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data bp_infracfg[SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA];
>> + const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data bp_smi[SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA];
>> };
>> struct scpsys_domain {
>> @@ -86,6 +105,7 @@ struct scpsys_domain {
>> int num_clks;
>> struct clk_bulk_data *clks;
>> struct regmap *infracfg;
>> + struct regmap *smi;
>> };
>> struct scpsys_soc_data {
>> @@ -175,9 +195,9 @@ static int _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(const struct
>> scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd, st
>> if (bpd[i].bus_prot_reg_update)
>> regmap_update_bits(regmap, INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN, mask, mask);
>> else
>> - regmap_write(regmap, INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN_SET, mask);
>> + regmap_write(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_set, mask);
>> - ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(regmap, INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTSTA1,
>> + ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_sta,
>> val, (val & mask) == mask,
>> MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
>> if (ret)
>> @@ -193,7 +213,11 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_enable(struct scpsys_domain
>> *pd)
>> int ret;
>> ret = _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(bpd, pd->infracfg);
>> - return ret;
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + bpd = pd->data->bp_smi;
>> + return _scpsys_bus_protect_enable(bpd, pd->smi);
>> }
>> static int _scpsys_bus_protect_disable(const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data
>> *bpd,
>> @@ -208,11 +232,11 @@ static int _scpsys_bus_protect_disable(const struct
>> scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd,
>> return 0;
>> if (bpd[i].bus_prot_reg_update)
>> - regmap_update_bits(regmap, INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN, mask, 0);
>> + regmap_update_bits(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_set, mask, 0);
>> else
>> - regmap_write(regmap, INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN_CLR, mask);
>> + regmap_write(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_clr, mask);
>> - ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(regmap, INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTSTA1,
>> + ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(regmap, bpd[i].bus_prot_sta,
>> val, !(val & mask),
>> MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT);
>> if (ret)
>> @@ -228,7 +252,11 @@ static int scpsys_bus_protect_disable(struct
>> scpsys_domain *pd)
>> int ret;
>> ret = _scpsys_bus_protect_disable(bpd, pd->infracfg);
>> - return ret;
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + bpd = pd->data->bp_smi;
>> + return _scpsys_bus_protect_disable(bpd, pd->smi);
>
> Also it seems not to break the system we should disable pd->smi first and after
> that pd->infracfg (just the other way round as we did in enable).
>
Done in next version.
>> }
>> static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
>> @@ -358,6 +386,10 @@ static int scpsys_add_one_domain(struct scpsys *scpsys,
>> struct device_node *node
>> if (IS_ERR(pd->infracfg))
>> pd->infracfg = NULL;
>> + pd->smi = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(node, "mediatek,smi");
>> + if (IS_ERR(pd->smi))
>> + pd->smi = NULL;
>> +
>> pd->num_clks = of_clk_get_parent_count(node);
>> if (pd->num_clks > 0) {
>> pd->clks = devm_kcalloc(scpsys->dev, pd->num_clks,
>> sizeof(*pd->clks), GFP_KERNEL);
>> @@ -528,10 +560,9 @@ static const struct scpsys_domain_data
>> scpsys_domain_data_mt8173[] = {
>> .ctl_offs = SPM_DIS_PWR_CON,
>> .sram_pdn_bits = GENMASK(11, 8),
>> .sram_pdn_ack_bits = GENMASK(12, 12),
>> - .bp_infracfg[0] = {
>> - .bus_prot_reg_update = true,
>> - .bus_prot_mask = MT8173_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_MM_M0 |
>> - MT8173_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_MM_M1,
>> + .bp_infracfg = {
>> + BUS_PROT_UPDATE_MT8173(MT8173_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_MM_M0 |
>> + MT8173_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_MM_M1),
>> },
>> },
>> [MT8173_POWER_DOMAIN_VENC_LT] = {
>> @@ -570,12 +601,11 @@ static const struct scpsys_domain_data
>> scpsys_domain_data_mt8173[] = {
>> .ctl_offs = SPM_MFG_PWR_CON,
>> .sram_pdn_bits = GENMASK(13, 8),
>> .sram_pdn_ack_bits = GENMASK(21, 16),
>> - .bp_infracfg[0] = {
>> - .bus_prot_reg_update = true,
>> - .bus_prot_mask = MT8173_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_MFG_S |
>> - MT8173_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_MFG_M0 |
>> - MT8173_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_MFG_M1 |
>> - MT8173_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_MFG_SNOOP_OUT,
>> + .bp_infracfg = {
>> + BUS_PROT_UPDATE_MT8173(MT8173_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_MFG_S |
>> + MT8173_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_MFG_M0 |
>> + MT8173_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_MFG_M1 |
>> + MT8173_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_MFG_SNOOP_OUT),
>> },
>> },
>> };
>> diff --git a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/infracfg.h
>> b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/infracfg.h
>> index f967d02cc2ff..3f18cddffb44 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/infracfg.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/infracfg.h
>> @@ -37,6 +37,12 @@
>> #define INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN_SET 0x0260
>> #define INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN_CLR 0x0264
>> +#define BUS_PROT_UPDATE_MT8173(_mask) \
>
> While at it, could you update this to call it:
> BUS_PROT_UPDATE_TOPAXI as in all the other SoCs TOPAXI is mapped to the same
> address.
>
Sure, done in next version.
> Thanks!
> Matthias
>
>> + BUS_PROT_UPDATE(_mask, \
>> + INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN, \
>> + INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN_CLR, \
>> + INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTSTA1)
>> +
>> int mtk_infracfg_set_bus_protection(struct regmap *infracfg, u32 mask,
>> bool reg_update);
>> int mtk_infracfg_clear_bus_protection(struct regmap *infracfg, u32 mask,
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-26 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-01 16:01 [PATCH v2 00/12] soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Add new driver for SCPSYS power domains controller Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-10-01 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] dt-bindings: power: Add bindings for the Mediatek " Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-10-01 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] soc: mediatek: Add MediaTek SCPSYS power domains Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-10-05 1:39 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-10-26 15:17 ` Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-10-27 0:19 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-10-27 16:25 ` Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-10-28 1:13 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-10-30 10:29 ` Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-10-30 12:44 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-10-01 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] arm64: dts: mediatek: Add mt8173 power domain controller Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-10-01 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Add bus protection protocol Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-10-01 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] soc: mediatek: pm_domains: Make bus protection generic Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-10-01 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Add SMI block as bus protection block Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-10-02 8:56 ` Matthias Brugger
2020-10-05 1:48 ` Nicolas Boichat
2020-10-05 10:28 ` Matthias Brugger
2020-10-26 15:18 ` Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-10-26 15:18 ` Enric Balletbo i Serra [this message]
2020-10-01 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Add extra sram control Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-10-02 9:24 ` Matthias Brugger
2020-10-01 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Add subsystem clocks Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-10-02 9:04 ` Matthias Brugger
2020-10-26 15:17 ` Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-10-01 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Allow bus protection to ignore clear ack Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-10-01 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] dt-bindings: power: Add MT8183 power domains Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-10-01 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Add support for mt8183 Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-10-01 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] arm64: dts: mediatek: Add mt8183 power domains controller Enric Balletbo i Serra
2020-10-02 9:11 ` Matthias Brugger
2020-10-11 14:55 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=728d3c36-0f89-c3f9-e9f8-88a3a671cd02@collabora.com \
--to=enric.balletbo@collabora.com \
--cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
--cc=fparent@baylibre.com \
--cc=hsinyi@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=mbrugger@suse.com \
--cc=weiyi.lu@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®