From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>,
James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] nvme-fabrics: short-circuit connect retries
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 11:37:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <72c1d3a8-14ad-43e8-a68a-25be903698c4@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22b01fb4-b543-43b2-949c-1873105dc343@grimberg.me>
On 3/7/24 09:00, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
> On 05/03/2024 10:00, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>> I've picked up Hannes' DNR patches. In short the make the transports
>> behave the same way when the DNR bit set on a re-connect attempt. We
>> had a discussion this
>> topic in the past and if I got this right we all agreed is that the
>> host should honor the DNR bit on a connect attempt [1]
> Umm, I don't recall this being conclusive though. The spec ought to be
> clearer here I think.
I've asked the NVMexpress fmds group, and the response was pretty
unanimous that the DNR bit on connect should be evaluated.
>>
>> The nvme/045 test case (authentication tests) in blktests is a good
>> test case for this after extending it slightly. TCP and RDMA try to
>> reconnect with an
>> invalid key over and over again, while loop and FC stop after the
>> first fail.
>
> Who says that invalid key is a permanent failure though?
>
See the response to the other patchset.
'Invalid key' in this context means that the _client_ evaluated the key
as invalid, ie the key is unusable for the client.
As the key is passed in via the commandline there is no way the client
can ever change the value here, and no amount of retry will change
things here. That's what we try to fix.
The controller surely can return an invalid key, but that's part of
the authenticaion protocol and will be evaluated differently.
Cheers,
Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-07 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-05 8:00 Daniel Wagner
2024-03-05 8:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] nvme-tcp: short-circuit reconnect retries Daniel Wagner
2024-03-06 8:10 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-03-05 8:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] nvme-rdma: " Daniel Wagner
2024-03-06 8:11 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-03-06 8:17 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-03-07 8:00 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] nvme-fabrics: short-circuit connect retries Sagi Grimberg
2024-03-07 10:37 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2024-03-07 11:30 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-03-07 11:45 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-03-07 12:14 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-03-07 12:52 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-03-08 10:21 ` Sagi Grimberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=72c1d3a8-14ad-43e8-a68a-25be903698c4@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=dwagner@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®