mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
To: Hou Wenlong <houwenlong.hwl@antgroup.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,  Borislav Petkov	 <bp@alien8.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86/mm: Fix wrong usage of 'MAX_ASID_AVAILABLE' in global ASID allocation
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 21:11:05 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <72cab895a33a10d634b672bbc332989d17316fb5.camel@surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55dd1b47ef7c8dd5518878fc682290825570225d.1743250122.git.houwenlong.hwl@antgroup.com>

On Sat, 2025-03-29 at 21:05 +0800, Hou Wenlong wrote:
> 'MAX_ASID_AVAILABLE' represents the maximum valid ASID in the current
> definetion, meaning that the available ASID range is [0,
> MAX_ASID_AVAILABLE]. So the actual count of available ASIDs is
> 'MAX_ASID_AVAIABLE + 1'. However, global ASID allocation use this
> value
> as the size of the bitmap, which results in the maximum ASID number
> being excluded from global ASID allocation. To address this issue,
> redefine the 'MAX_ASID_AVAILABLE' as the count of available ASIDs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hou Wenlong <houwenlong.hwl@antgroup.com>

Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>

-- 
All Rights Reversed.

      reply	other threads:[~2025-03-30  1:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-29 13:05 [PATCH 0/3] Fix some ASID range size calculation issues " Hou Wenlong
2025-03-29 13:05 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/mm: Correct the actual count of available global ASIDs Hou Wenlong
2025-03-29 17:29   ` Rik van Riel
2025-03-31  3:46     ` Hou Wenlong
2025-03-29 13:05 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm/tlb: Fix wrong judgement in allocate_global_asid() Hou Wenlong
2025-03-29 17:33   ` Rik van Riel
2025-03-31  5:12     ` Hou Wenlong
2025-03-31 12:58       ` Hou Wenlong
2025-03-29 13:05 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/mm: Fix wrong usage of 'MAX_ASID_AVAILABLE' in global ASID allocation Hou Wenlong
2025-03-30  1:11   ` Rik van Riel [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=72cab895a33a10d634b672bbc332989d17316fb5.camel@surriel.com \
    --to=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=houwenlong.hwl@antgroup.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®