From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from todd.t-8ch.de (todd.t-8ch.de [159.69.126.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E6FF3BE15E for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2026 17:24:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=159.69.126.157 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777310650; cv=none; b=lRSsw2iP9O463CV/8aPt+3YECO+QUGiQw6VCHMROcc5+eSavprGYb1K7j1w8opT7HnCv3bj2X6ykU164eC1zPG6gCbtyZdpgGVbpF9tMNvlv0TEbEZI/29vCxa3X2t5lMoN1hHvShG7L+YWuHMW1GavX6QFzIF030hhlhJZF+GY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777310650; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9Zm04WFVbqBSIM6OGHmt9ySrTpbWTJCJ4XgBdTDNnf4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=pr+q3RLw1DCbe9LNLMy3s2occgK6A2kXSJOnB+1RTkaJ4N5dXHSPGoIVW1jbnTUM26Jn3tACgDfvvae7r8miDvcadVF5E4O9h77G+8dfpFrVCxMLNLnDITnAR9p5Z+fc29PzGkxUoaUL2DwkCdUysxLPTNF99DUjgaxXdkYc52Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=weissschuh.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=weissschuh.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=weissschuh.net header.i=@weissschuh.net header.b=tBDeUTbj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=159.69.126.157 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=weissschuh.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=weissschuh.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=weissschuh.net header.i=@weissschuh.net header.b="tBDeUTbj" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=weissschuh.net; s=mail; t=1777310647; bh=9Zm04WFVbqBSIM6OGHmt9ySrTpbWTJCJ4XgBdTDNnf4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=tBDeUTbjrgNGPuBXsmvSZAnMGBEXC8KKIaL0ZFRB8MNSVBFaIkI562b8PqXO9vC8u gtc+aREenLXsJM9DHTR1FolDhCh+e7Hahwf7QKQRm2j4mGoo3DVwh7EkGH00FR/Yw0 N1ZeK08zf7oCtZpSeB0cu6Nsm+X/q2V1gkOiazss= Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 19:24:06 +0200 From: Thomas =?utf-8?Q?Wei=C3=9Fschuh?= To: Daniel Palmer Cc: w@1wt.eu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tools/nolibc: Rename __no_stack_protector to __nolibc_no_stack_protector Message-ID: <72f55fd7-4008-4668-871c-ba9572c751cc@t-8ch.de> References: <20260425111315.3191461-1-daniel@thingy.jp> <20260425111315.3191461-2-daniel@thingy.jp> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260425111315.3191461-2-daniel@thingy.jp> On 2026-04-25 20:13:14+0900, Daniel Palmer wrote: > To avoid polluting the namespace rename __no_stack_protector to > __nolibc_no_stack_protector so its now within the nolibc umbrella. Both patches applied, thanks! > Suggested-by: Willy Tarreau > Signed-off-by: Daniel Palmer (...)